Juju SRU and QA plans

[Robie Basak]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:30:49PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> If upstream doesn't intend to reuse version numbers, you're over-
> complicating with the PPA business.  Just do this "soft" release to
> proposed, test it and, if it sucks, remove and iterate, if it's good,
> everyone wins.
> 
> If the concen is auto-migration in the devel series, you can file
> blocking bugs that you close when the upstream QA is complete, so
> that "bad" binaries don't slip in, thus mirroring the SRU process.

Thanks. As there were no objections, I'll follow this process and see
how it goes. I've just created https://launchpad.net/bugs/1386144 if
anyone wants to follow along. I'll prepare and upload to trusty-proposed
and vivid-proposed shortly.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20141027/5eb435e3/attachment.pgp>