S Release Schedule
Phill Whiteside
PhillW at Ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 29 22:23:55 UTC 2013
Hi,
Lubuntu have not decided yet if we are going with Alpha's for 13.10. But
I've taken the chance to chat with our head of Dev (Julien) and he has no
objection to the alpha's being moved by a week later to better suit the kde
--> kubuntu alpha's. It has no real affect on lubuntu and makes sense for
one of our family; as such we support such a move.
Regards,
Phill.
On 27 March 2013 13:38, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> It looks to me like, for Kubuntu, having Alpha 1 and Alpha 2 a week later
> would be better. The current dates are right on top of KDE 4.11 beta 1 and
> release candidate 1. If we go a week later, we can have those ready for
> the
> milestones.
>
> Scott K
>
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:28:35 AM Pete Graner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I updated the "S" schedule [1]. The schedule is typical and looks very
> > similar to what we did for 12.10 date wise. I added the 3 opt-in
> > Alphas and 1 opt-in Beta for the flavors that wish to participate.
> > Additionally I added in the next vUDS as well.
> >
> > If there are any questions or concerns let me know.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ~pete
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager -
> > <pgraner at canonical.com> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Pete Graner <pete.graner at canonical.com
> >
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > >>> I just had a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule and it
> > >>> seems like the relevant parts of it were written in September 2011.
> > >>
> > >> Right, this was pretty much just a template carried forward, I should
> > >> go fill it in with approximate dates based on what we've done for
> > >> raring (which should come close to the truth), and we can polish it
> > >> later if we decide to refine things.
> > >>
> > >> (In light of that, if you need dates before I go edit the wiki, you
> > >> can just use raring's schedule and add ~6mo, or so)
> > >>
> > >> ... Adam
> > >
> > > Its on my TODO for this week. As Adam said the current S schedule is
> > > just a template. I had been waiting on the Tech Board decision [1] on
> > > the release process which happened on Monday, before putting the work
> > > into a new schedule. I'll have it done by EOW.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/03/19/ubuntu-technical-board-looks-at-shutt
> > > leworths-proposal-for-release-management-methodology/
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > ~pete
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager -
> > > <pgraner at canonical.com> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20130329/a46e8581/attachment.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-release
mailing list