Release team meeting?

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:48:45PM +0000, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:29:09PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:

> > It seems like it would be a good time to resume weekly summary
> > emails and meeting ... is that planned? What do others think?

> I think there's absolutely value in the summaries to the list
> continuing, but opinions seemed to be up in the air about the
> value of the meeting itself.  I'm pretty firmly in the camp
> that prefers not to have meetings for the sake of meetings,
> though if there were sane arguments put forward for the value
> of the meeting, I'm not entirely against it.

I believe the agreement at UDS was that we would forego the weekly IRC
meetings in favor of using bug targeting more aggressively and continuing
with the weekly email reports.

  http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-r/meeting/21047/foundations-r-prior-release-feedback/

Sorry, I'm marked as the drafter on this one, I should probably get that
drafted.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20121115/b2df176e/attachment.pgp>