Changes to the SRU processes?

[Brian Murray]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:11:30PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 17/07/2012 21:59, Stéphane Graber a écrit :
> >Can't we have a bot spotting new bugs matching the version in -proposed
> >and marking verification-failed the master bug in such case (or any bug
> >linked to the SRU, so that it's blocked)?
> 
> While an improvement that wouldn't have caught the recent issue with
> xorg-server which was reported against gimp (the issue was "xorg
> segfaults when using gimp") before being reassigned to xorg ... not
> sure how we can be smart enough to catch those though out of listing
> all the bugs reported on ,reassigned to the said source and having
> somebody reviewing the list before SRU copy.

One thing I've recently done is modify the sru-accept message to be more
verbose regarding the SRU verification process so that we try and
educate each person who is running -proposed.  Our hope was that more
people would tag bugs regression-proposed when appropriate.

--
Brian Murray
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20120717/4ecc97c3/attachment.pgp>