[QA] Release Meeting 2012-08-24
Gema Gomez
gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com
Fri Aug 24 09:35:44 UTC 2012
Hi all,
I found some stuff to report, see below.
=== Release Testing ===
==== Quantal Testing ====
*Builds*
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/isotesting/builds/quantal.html
*Testing*
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Quantal
- Desktop:
- No new issue found this week.
- Alternate:
- Found two new bugs on alternate installations:
lp-1040427: oem/lvm installation of quantal alternate i386 iso failed :
Unable to locate package python-couchdb , subunit , python-subunit
,python-junitxml
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1040427
lp-1039970: failed to install quantal alternate iso:
xserver-xorg-video-all : Depends: xserver-xorg-video-modesetting but it
is not installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1039970
*** This bug has been fixed and the corresponding tests have started
passing ***
- Server:
- Existing bug:
lp-1028453: Quantal Ubuntu Server minimal install oversized -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1028453
keeps impacting some server tests.
*** Bug first reported on 24/07/2012 ***
- No new issues found this week with server tests
* Upgrades:
- One new bug that affected a few upgrades but has now disappeared
lp-1039031: /vmlinuz.old is a damaged link error after precise to
quantal upgrade.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1039031
The bug is now marked 'invalid' by the reporter since the failures have
disappeared
- Existing bugs:
lp-1022927: Upgrade tests failed: obsolete files left after the upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brltty/+bug/1022927
*** Bug first reported on 09/08/2012 ***
lp-1034889: Oneiric to Precise and Precise to Quantal upgrade: debconf
prompt to update unmodified configuration file: /etc/sudoers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1034889
*** Bug first reported on 09/08/2012 ***
==== Precise Testing ====
*Builds*
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/isotesting/builds/precise.html
*Testing*
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Precise/
* ISO testing
- Desktop
- No new test runs this week
- Alternate
- There have been a couple of respins on 22/08/12 and some of them had
different kernel version and the final one: 20120822.4 is in better state
- Server
- No new test runs for this week
* Upgrades:
- Found new bugs:
lp-1040002: lucid upgrade to precise amd64 universe failed: E:Error,
pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1040002
lp-1040494: Unable to perform cdromupgrade without network from Lucid to
Precise 12.04.1 AMD64 : E:Could not perform immediate configuration on
'python-minimal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1040494
*** Found during manual iso upgrade testing, after we respun due to
bug 1039828 (found by a contributor on 08/22/2012). Network-less
installs are likely to fail when doing LTS to LTS upgrade.
- Existing bugs:
lp-1022927: Upgrade tests failed: obsolete files left after the upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brltty/+bug/1022927
lp-1034889: Oneiric to Precise and Precise to Quantal upgrade: debconf
prompt to update
unmodified configuration file: /etc/sudoers
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1034889)
* 12.04.1 Report
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/PrecisePoint1TestingReport
=== What was done engineering wise? ===
Progress made on UTAH. Making the tool stable for more varied production
use.
=== What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release
as a whole? ===
Still working on the graphs, data is almost fully refreshed by now, we
are rerunning on the old builds to be able to see trends:
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/boot-speed
=== Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/qa/qa-open-bugs-quantal.html
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/qa/qa-open-bugs.html
=== Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items,
release wide concerns? ===
The release process as is is ineffective as it does not take into
account the testing efforts.
=== Team Status ===
http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/canonical-platform-qa.html
Cheers,
Gema
--
Gema Gomez-Solano <gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com>
Ubuntu QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com
More information about the Ubuntu-release
mailing list