proposal: delegates (including map to person names and lp ids)

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

(resending original mail at [1], this time with names, launchpad ids and irc 
nicks) 

this is a possible list of delegates for packages found in universe. confirmed
means that the person in question already volunteered to take that position,
unconfirmed means that I didn't get an answer (yet).

* kde: drop, covered by Jonathan Riddell (~jr) [Riddell] already.
* server: drop, covered by Scott Kitterman (~kitterman) [ScottK] already.
* mythbuntu: Mario Limonciello (~superm1) [superm1] (confirmed)
* mozilla team: Alexander Sack (~asac) [asac] (confirmed), Micah Gersten 
(~micahg) [micahg] (fallback - confirmed)
* ubuntustudio: drop, response time was not too good in the past.
* xubuntu: Cody A.W. Somerville (~cody-somerville) [cody-somerville] 
(confirmed), Lionel Le Folgoc (~mrpouit) [mr_pouit] (unconfirmed)
* desktop (gnome): Sebastien Bacher (~seb128) [seb128] (unconfirmed)
* netbook: merging with desktop? still needed? maybe Didier Roche  (~didrocks) 
[didrocks] (unconfirmed)?
* edubuntu: Jonathan Carter (~jonathan) [highvoltage] (unconfirmed), Stéphane 
Graber (~stgraber) [stgraber] (confirmed)

what do you think? Anything you disagree with? Any other delegations that 
should be made? Any ideas for everything where's a question mark?

Finally, as Emmet asked me via irc: Should delegates be able to acknowledge
freeze exceptions, in case the package in question is seeded *only* by the
relevant team?
Personally, I'd like to be conservative and defer that idea to lucid + 1.

Cheers,
    Stefan.
--
[1]: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2010-March/000037.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20100326/2d18c857/attachment.pgp