<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/11/12 17:02, Nicholas Skaggs
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:509BE599.3000504@canonical.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<font face="Verdana">A fair warning, this is going to be long, but
it's important to digest everything in here :-)<br>
--<br>
I trust everyone has enjoyed a little downtime, and for those of
you who were at UDS or participated remotely, I trust you've
been able to digest everything now :-) So, it's time for us to
start work on the new items for the cycle, as well plan out our
cadence weeks.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Cadence/Raring">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Cadence/Raring</a><br>
</font></blockquote>
<font face="Verdana">Are you planning to link the calendar entries
to dedicated wiki pages for that cadence week, as discussed at the
UDS session?</font><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:509BE599.3000504@canonical.com" type="cite"><font
face="Verdana"> <br>
Please have a look at that wiki page. It's been hotlinked in the
menu header on our wiki (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam">http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam</a>).
There are 11 cadence weeks listed out, occurring every 2 weeks
(except for the middle week in December to avoid Holidays). I
know there are also holidays many of you celebrate in April that
may coincide with Cadence Week 10, but we'll work around those.
The weeks run Saturday to Saturday based on feedback @ UDS about
including more weekends when it would be easier to participate.<br>
<br>
Now, the plan is to unite automated and manual testing, and
during the cadence weeks we will undertake both :-) What I would
like now is suggestions for specific areas to focus on during
the first few weeks of testing. As the cycle wears on, we will
focus our testing efforts on new features or things that are
currently lacking in quality (from the planned quality report).
I've started by suggesting we look at libreoffice during our
first cadence week due to the mailing list and bug traffic
surrounding the global menu and some other things. Other ideas?
Now is a good time IMHO to look at our default application
stack, but anything is fair game.<br>
<br>
Which brings me to pointing out another page to you. At the
moment, it's a bit difficult to know what's in the tracker for
testcases if your not an admin. We'll be working to fix this,
but in the meantime here's a wiki page listing and linking to
all of our current testcases. Just because a testcase is or is
not listed in there doesn't mean it shouldn't be added. I would
like us to look at and test all of our default applications and
have automated and manual testcases to test them. This is a
excellent area to help. I'll be working on revamping the wiki to
make the process of contributing testcases easier to understand;
both automated and manual. Don't let this stop you from diving
in now -- ping the list with what your interested in doing, and
everyone can help you get started if your unsure. Now is the
perfect time to do work in this area.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/TestCase/Coverage">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/TestCase/Coverage</a><br>
<br>
Remember, now is the time to speak up about the changes, as we
can tweak things as we go in the cycle, especially if we do so
early in the cycle ;-) Please give your feedback positive or
negative. I look forward to a wonderful cycle of testing with
everyone. The groundwork and plans have been laid; let's take QA
to the next level!<br>
<br>
Nicholas<br>
</font> <br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>