<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/08/12 18:41, Nicholas Skaggs
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:503BB12D.2060306@canonical.com" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/27/2012 01:15 PM, Carla Sella
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:503BAB41.2030300@gmail.com" type="cite">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/27/2012 05:44 PM, Nicholas
          Skaggs wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:503B95CA.8080008@canonical.com"
          type="cite">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/27/2012 11:29 AM, Elfy
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote cite="mid:503B9257.6090902@btinternet.com"
            type="cite">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27/08/12 16:16, Nicholas
              Skaggs wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote cite="mid:503B8F3A.8050308@canonical.com"
              type="cite">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/27/2012 10:01 AM, Elfy
                wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote cite="mid:503B7DCB.7060005@btinternet.com"
                type="cite">
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/08/12 23:46, Nicholas
                  Skaggs wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote cite="mid:5032BE48.5040706@canonical.com"
                  type="cite"> <br>
                  For those of you braving ARM installations, I tried an
                  sd-based installation this week and updated the
                  instructions on the wiki page. Elfy, Carla, et la, I
                  can confirm your findings of this bug(s):<br>
                  <br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                    href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1036742">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1036742</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                    href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1036988">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1036988</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/313452">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/313452</a><br>
                  <br>
                  and the workaround. It's documented for now on the
                  page:<br>
                  <br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                    href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/QA/Pandaboard">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/QA/Pandaboard</a><br>
                  <br>
                  Thanks!<br>
                  Nicholas<br>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          You umounted /dev/sdc :-) You have to unmount a parition
          anyways, so it would be something like /dev/sdd1, etc. Try
          putting a partition on /dev/sdd , making sure you can mount
          it, and then issuing the dd command. Obviously it will be
          wiped by dd, but let's  confirm the disk is working.<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Nicholas<br>
          <br>
          <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    That is more or less what I was doing earlier - so yea can confirm
    that <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:503BB12D.2060306@canonical.com" type="cite">
      <blockquote cite="mid:503BAB41.2030300@gmail.com" type="cite"> <br>
        Hello,<br>
        I tried too to download today's image, but strangely it's only
        22MB big, normally it was 660MB.<br>
        I tried to copy it to my SD card as I have always done, but when
        you then launch gparted you get no partitions on it.<br>
        I checked the md5sum and it's ok, but 22M can't be right, could
        there be something wrong with the image loaded on the iso
        tracker ?<br>
        Carla<br>
        <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Carla Sella
email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:carla.sella@gmail.com">carla.sella@gmail.com</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/%7Ecarla-sella">https://launchpad.net/~carla-sella</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://qa.ubuntu.com/">http://qa.ubuntu.com/</a></pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Yikes! 22mb file? Elfy, Carla, yep definitely not a valid image. I
      marked it for re-build. As I mentioned, this week is going to be
      crazy with images failing all over the place. Keep your eyes open!<br>
      <br>
      Nicholas<br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    That's probably why I had the issues - waiting for an image of a
    sensible size :)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>