does the mac version work in a virtual machine? i have access to one but windows is installed and my brother wont allow ubuntu to be put on.<div> </div><div>jackson <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <<a href="mailto:nicholas.skaggs@canonical.com" target="_blank">nicholas.skaggs@canonical.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div>A special thanks to all of our testers this week! gregfaith, victor.zhou, redmar, larsnooden, carla-sella, michael-kroll, doak-jackson, k1fri, sjskaggs, kate.stewart, fabiomarconi, smartboyhw, lbsolost, robinc The status page (<tt><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Cadence/Status" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Cadence/Status</a>)</tt> is showing we still need some help on amd64+mac, along with some test for wubi, and ARM. I'll be testing ARM tonight and tomorrow, those of you with ARM hardware consider also pitching in a result this week if your able :-) I know Tobias is still working on results for wubi as well, and I can help with the cd boot helper tests. That just leaves us with the amd64+mac builds to test. Does anyone have mac hardware who is willing to test an install for this iso? Thanks! Nicholas P.S. I've seen bugs and reports that ubiquity is buggy and unstable in todays build. If you find that to be true in testing, don't panic! File any bugs you find and try to complete the install. If it fails, still report it. A failed to install is still a valid result! On 08/08/2012 04:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite"> What I've taken to calling 'cadence' testing, is the testing of the daily builds of isos (specifically those focused on the desktop and ubuntu) over the course of a non-milestone week, with the intent of insuring the mandatory testcases for those isos pass. I know this has been a difficult thing to understand, and sadly, right now the isotracker doesn't allow us to do this testing in a nice and easy to see way. We plan to fix this by allowing you to better browse history but for now we'll have to work-around the limitation (BTW, if anyone knows drupal and wishes to help land this quicker, I would be happy to help set you up. We can always use more developers!). I've put together a wiki page that I will update once a day this week (about 1400 UTC, manually) with the targeted testcases and their status. The page is located here. <tt><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Cadence/Status" target="_blank">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Cadence/Status</a></tt> I hope this proves helpful to everyone, and as you can see we already have results for many of the testcases. We need folks who have access to ARM and MAC to also contribute a result for a testcase to help round us out. As you can see, I've placed a quick summary of our progress on each of the isos and testcases at the top, followed by the raw results in a tabular format of those who have tested. Please don't panic if that raw list is missing some of your testing! I still see the results submitted from those of you who have tested server, or alt images, or another flavor. For brevity's sake on this page, it's filtered to only show the runs for the isos above. I hope this helps and thank you for sticking with the testing on this. ISO testing is going to continue to be something for all of us to iterate upon and improve to make better. We as a community want to provide solid, dependable results and good feedback, while still being mindful of our efforts and time spent. Thanks, Nicholas <fieldset></fieldset> </blockquote> </div> -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa</a> </blockquote></div> </div>