#1543046 wrongly marked as fixed for Wily

php fan php4fan at gmail.com
Fri Jul 8 15:13:26 UTC 2016


You obviously misunderstood my reply to your question (which maybe I
misunderstood in turn). You asked me:

> What is the different between a team member and you on testing the bug?

Which I interpreted as "why would you expect anybody from the QA team to
test a bug more than you'd expect anybody else to"?
I was replying to that, and I explicitly stressed:
>  (note, before you ban me,  this is a "generic 'you'" and an hypothetic
'if')


> If you don't care about helping Ubuntu QA, why are you in this list in
the first place?

[note an important difference between this question and mine: I asked "if
you don't care *that much*", not "if you don't care", by which I meant
"enough to run a one-command-line test to check whether the issue is
actually fixed in Trusty"]

I do care about helping Ubuntu QA. That's why I am in this list, and that's
why I wrote to it to inform you that there's a bug that is incorrectly
marked as fixed in Wily, which I thought was an issue that should be of
interest to the QA team. I am surprised that a QA team member (not you)
would rather spend their time explaining why it's not so important to
correct the status of the bug, than spend a tiny fraction of that time to
actually do it.



2016-07-08 14:33 GMT+02:00 Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e at gmail.com>:

> Alberto:
>
>> If you don't care about helping Ubuntu QA, why are you in this list in
>> the first place?
>>
>
> Oh men, I obviously should not answer messages like these. As they can
> turn a good day into something worse.
>
> So I'm moving to the happy band, thank you.
>
>
>


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list