Google Code In - Documentation
kevin.michael.lloyd at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 16:18:07 UTC 2015
Awesome. I'll work on cleaning it up and making it clearer.
On 11/23/15 8:23 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> This sounds like a plan Mike. We'll just need to make sure the
> description for the task makes sense to students.
> We have to have 75 tasks to start, and need to supply at least 150
> over the course of the program I believe. There's no upper limit ;-)
> On 11/20/2015 12:07 PM, Mike Lloyd wrote:
>> Well, I've already crawled some of them with a Python script. I still
>> have to go through them and remove various image and external links.
>> Once I've done that, I'll create a spreadsheet based off this list. I
>> am thinking of letting the students work on whatever part of the list
>> they would like, whatever interests them most.
>> I'm fine with the review idea. I have the task set to the max of 10
>> days, with the max amount of students allowed. Later reviews are most
>> likely going to be easier.
>> Yeah, I think a QA wiki task would be good, and have it separate from
>> the Help wiki task. I think we get 75 tasks as an org? I saw three,
>> including mine, last night when I was logged in.
>> On 11/20/15 9:08 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2015 05:54 PM, Mike Lloyd wrote:
>>>> Hey guys. I created a documentation task that will help go through and
>>>> clean up help pages.
>>>> For students to pick work from, I will generate a master
>>>> spreadsheet of
>>>> pages based off a site crawler, then each student can pick whatever
>>>> they want to review from the spreadsheet.
>>>> To verify the what wiki help pages need to be updated, I would have
>>>> student assigned to the page walk through the page, following it
>>>> step-by-step to make sure it is correct. If it doesn't work, the
>>>> can then do research into how to make it work. If the student get's
>>>> and can't figure out what steps are needed to make the information
>>>> they can ask a mentor for help. Before updating the page, I would
>>>> have the
>>>> student email the changes to a mentor, have the mentor review the
>>>> changes, and then have the student update the page once a mentor has
>>>> If a page should be deleted, then the student can mark a page for
>>>> After the GCI is over, the list can be reviewed by the QA community
>>>> a page is deleted.
>>>> I figure this is the best way to keep our help pages current. What
>>>> are the
>>>> community thoughts? I based this off the Wiki Pages task example
>>>> from here:
>>>> Here is the initial task:
>>> Mike, a master list of potential pages is a good idea. Do you have a
>>> list to start? How will you crawl them? For the edits, I think it
>>> would be 'OK' to have the students edit the page directly, and then
>>> ask for a review. You could also do the whole clone / replace thing
>>> too if you don't like the idea of direct editing. That is, you copy
>>> the wiki page to a temporary page and edit it there. Once reviewed,
>>> you replace the original page and delete the copy.
>>> Specific to the QATeam wiki, I think having a task to go through
>>> each of the Roles pages is an excellent place to start. I imagine
>>> there's also some dead pages / cloned pages, etc that could be found
>>> by looking at things like
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam?action=LikePages and
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing?action=LikePages. I'm sure wiki
>>> experts would have even more tricks.
More information about the Ubuntu-quality