Package QA Tracker

[Simon Quigley]

>
> If a test result for a package in week 1 of a dev cycle shows a fail and
> has a bug filed against it why is that invalid in week 20 if it hasn't been
> fixed?
>
My point wasn't that. Then the QA person would have to reattach the bug(not
so hard if there was somewhat of a history).

> I'm not really sure how removing test results for a cycle is useful.
>
> I would expect QA people to know if a bug reported against a package is
> still relevant or not.
>
​
​Because of regression. If there is package regression and the QA tracker
shows a passed result, then it would be a little confusing to see a bug
report
​concerning the same package ​
by the same person, don't you think?​
​

-- 
Have a nice day,
Simon Quigley