Why I'm dropping raster pictographs in favour of glyphs

Alberto Salvia Novella es20490446e at gmail.com
Sun Aug 17 16:37:53 UTC 2014


Because:

  - Using raster pictographs obfuscates wiki code a lot.
  - Web browsers generally represent missing pictographs glyphs by a 
square, instead of a annoying question mark as in email.

I have decided to drop raster pictographs in favour of glyphs, sorry.


Just compare having the following wiki-code:

  ||<style="border:none;width:5%;">{{attachment:Pictographs/1F4AC Speech 
Balloon.svg}}||<style="border:none;">It is written in '''English'''.||
  ||<style="border:none;width:5%;">{{attachment:Pictographs/1F44D Thumbs 
Up Sign.svg}}||<style="border:none;">It seems it can be 
[[/Fixable|fixable]].||

With:

  * [] It has '''enough information'''.
  * [] The '''title''' is as specific as possible.


Regards.



More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list