Bug importances - Suggestion for improvement

[C de-Avillez]

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella <
es20490446e at gmail.com> wrote:

> El 08/04/14 14:51, Thomas Ward escribió:
>
>  Why would we want to put a "simplifies the packaging" or other
>> "simplifies X" (where X is anything) bugs as Critical priority, which
>> basically is a screaming red alert to devs for their respective packages?
>>
>
> With simplify I mean "to eliminate, clean or organize content of
> development or bug management":
>
>  - Merge
>  - Sync
>  - Remove
>  - Promote
>  - Demote
>
> The reason for this kind of bugs to be set critical is developers to start
> working in this special bugs, which potentially can save tons of coding in
> fixes that are already upstream and throw out which work is real.
>
> Moreover these bugs are bytesize and there are only a few of them.
>


Workflow are *NOT* bugs. They are set as bugs because this is what
launchpad allows. The so-called "workflow bugs" are outside the scope of
triaging. Bug management does not apply to workflow bugs.

Please, let us concentrate on actual bugs, and leave workflow bugs aside.

-- 
..hggdh..