[Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours....

Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
Fri Feb 22 21:23:08 UTC 2013


Yes, the milestones provided structure. We're missing good reporting for 
our dailies, but phillw and myself have opened a bug for that. Feel free 
to add to it:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1126449

For now, here's a link sorted by descending date of all incomplete or 
unconfirmed bugs reported via the iso tracker;

http://is.gd/qSVTH7

In addition, you can use the tracker reports to see things (though it is 
sorted by milestone):

http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects/opened

I think starting with the recent ones and weeding those down is a great 
focus. I'll try and target myself to weed out some during our cadence 
next week.

Nicholas

On 02/22/2013 03:34 PM, Lance wrote:
> It would be great to even have a list here on the QA mailing list.
>
> When we were doing normal Alpha testing we'd sometimes have many 
> rebuilds over a period of 3 to 4 days but we'd typically end up with 
> an image that was usable by most of us, and a compilation of bugs that 
> really needed attention.
>
> Now it's just a crap shoot.
>
> Lance
>
> --- On *Fri, 2/22/13, Jackson Doak /<doak.jackson at gmail.com>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Jackson Doak <doak.jackson at gmail.com>
>     Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours....
>     To: "Nicholas Skaggs" <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>     Cc: "Lance" <lbsolost at yahoo.com>, "lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net"
>     <lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net>, "Phill Whiteside"
>     <PhillW at ubuntu.com>, "Lubuntu Comms"
>     <lubuntu-comms at lists.launchpad.net>,
>     "ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com"
>     <ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>, "lubuntu-desktop"
>     <lubuntu-dkestop at lists.launchpad.net>
>     Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 2:20 PM
>
>     i might make a wiki page for iso bugs that need confirming/looking at.
>
>
>     On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Nicholas Skaggs
>     <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>     </mc/compose?to=nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>> wrote:
>
>         Jackson, that's a good idea actually. We should pull the
>         unconfirmed ubiquity bugs off the lp list and try and confirm
>         or deny them. We've done similar drives in past cycles as the
>         cycle gets further along. I think now is a good time. That's
>         something we as a team can do to help the developers. I'll try
>         and get a nice summary link to view and add it as a task for
>         our cadence week.
>
>         Thanks guys!
>
>
>         Nicholas
>
>         On 02/22/2013 03:03 PM, Jackson Doak wrote:
>>         there are things getting fixed, but not many. there doesn't
>>         seem to be enough testing though, even just to get some bugs
>>         confirmed. some bugs in the iso tracker have been "new" for a
>>         few months.
>>
>>
>>         On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Lance <lbsolost at yahoo.com
>>         </mc/compose?to=lbsolost at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Do you have a bug report # for that ubiquity bug?
>>
>>             I'm aware of this bug:
>>
>>             https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1080701
>>
>>             It's been bugging many of us since mid-November but we
>>             obviously no longer care about the ability to install
>>             and/or test the images until Beta falls :^(
>>
>>             I hate to be the turd in the punch-bowl, but why bother
>>             testing if nothing ever gets fixed?
>>
>>             Lance
>>
>>             PS: this is an indication that "cadence" should be
>>             renamed, maybe to "we'll look at it later"!
>>
>>             --- On *Thu, 2/21/13, Phill Whiteside
>>             /<PhillW at Ubuntu.com> </mc/compose?to=PhillW at Ubuntu.com>/*
>>             wrote:
>>
>>
>>                 From: Phill Whiteside <PhillW at Ubuntu.com>
>>                 </mc/compose?to=PhillW at Ubuntu.com>
>>                 Subject: [Lubuntu-qa] Desktop, Alternate and flavours....
>>                 To: lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net
>>                 </mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net>,
>>                 "Nicholas Skaggs" <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>                 </mc/compose?to=nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
>>                 Cc: "Lubuntu Comms"
>>                 <lubuntu-comms at lists.launchpad.net
>>                 </mc/compose?to=lubuntu-comms at lists.launchpad.net>>,
>>                 ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>                 </mc/compose?to=ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>,
>>                 "lubuntu-desktop"
>>                 <lubuntu-dkestop at lists.launchpad.net
>>                 </mc/compose?to=lubuntu-dkestop at lists.launchpad.net>>
>>                 Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013, 5:49 PM
>>
>>                 Hi good people,
>>
>>                 as we run through cadence testing, there does seem to
>>                 be a lack of testing. Can I ask that people do test
>>                 out the DeskTop versions for lubuntu and xubuntu as
>>                 we seem to have a gremlin in ubiquity that may only
>>                 affect our Virtual Machines. Also when you take the
>>                 time out to try the 'alternate' ISOs for lubuntu,
>>                 would you also please check out the basic
>>                 ubuntu-server ISO, as it is required for us to
>>                 maintain support for the lubuntu-alternate ISO series.
>>
>>                 Regards,
>>
>>                 Phill.
>>
>>                 P.S. if anyone who is receiving this sort of email
>>                 for the first time, please have a read of both the
>>                 below links and feel free to get in touch.
>>                 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing
>>                 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam
>>                 <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing>--
>>                 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>
>>                 -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>                 -- 
>>                 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>                 <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>>                 Post to     : lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net
>>                 <http://mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>
>>                 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>                 <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>>                 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>             --
>>             Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>             <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>>             Post to     : lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net
>>             </mc/compose?to=lubuntu-qa at lists.launchpad.net>
>>             Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>             <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa>
>>             More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130222/8a652ff1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list