Re-thinking Manual Testing
Nicholas Skaggs
nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
Mon Feb 4 22:32:56 UTC 2013
Phill, yes this might cause some folks to have to learn about launchpad,
but it's something that is good to learn -- it's not specific to QA and
is needed for contributing to many ubuntu areas.
As far as viewing and responding to working on the needed items, anyone
with a ubuntu SSO account can comment on the bug and express interest or
offer patches. I and others on the team would be happy to help them with
there contribution, including lessons on using launchpad if needed in
order to get it committed :-)The initial requirements (ubuntu sso) are
the same whether in lp or on the wiki. Contributing something is now a
skill that can be used to contribute to QA or any other lp project :-)
As always, I am happy to help anyone who would otherwise contribute, but
are unsure of how to navigate the tools. Feel free to ping me, email the
list, comment on a bug, whatever you wish. We'll help you out.
Thanks!
Nicholas
On 02/04/2013 05:00 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> yup,
>
> as soon as someone makes the time to explain all of this new area and
> usage. IIRC, you are supposed to have PGP / GPG keys to commit? Yet
> another step for people who can write a clear set of instructions to
> 'jump through a further hoop'?
>
> It still 'needs selling to me'. I'm one of the olde worlde fashioned
> people, I'm sure I'm not the only one :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
> On 4 February 2013 16:50, Nicholas Skaggs
> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
> wrote:
>
> I wanted to follow-up on this to say the wiki page of work
> assignments has been officially laid to rest. All the work is now
> in the bug tracker. Looking for something that needs contributing?
> Have a look!
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bugs?field.tag=todo
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> On 02/01/2013 12:24 AM, Javier P.L. wrote:
>
> Cool Nicholas, a total +1 to this, I think it'll help me to
> get more involved in
> manual testcase reviewing.
>
> One think I'd like to see will be testcases in differente
> languages, a lot more
> of people could help if they could be able to follow the steps.
>
> Greetings
>
> On 30/01/13 at 06:10pm, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>
> So, in an effort to bring more focus and exposure to
> manual testing,
> I've been a bit busy setting up a cleaner way for everyone to
> contribute testcases. In that vein, I'd like to announce
> that the
> manual tests on the tracker(s) are now all on launchpad.
> There is a
> launchpad project and you can branch and submit merge
> requests to
> get new testcases or testcase modifications in. In
> addition, you can
> easily file bugs when you find something wrong in a
> testcase :-)
> Check the project out here:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests
>
> Check out the tests here:
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/
> <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/files/head:/testcases/>
>
> So what does this mean for everyone? Let me share my
> thoughts and
> talk about ways you can help.
>
> It means anyone can see all the testcases in use at
> anytime, and
> feel free to contribute / suggest edits, just like any
> other ubuntu
> project. We will sync the testcases in the branch to the
> tracker as
> updates happen to the branch. This solves several problems
> of the
> current system; namely, only testcade admins can edit the
> actual
> testcase, and credit for the testcase is not well represented.
>
> So what do we need help with?
>
> 1) The QATeam wiki (wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam
> <http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam>) needs updated to reflect
> the new project
> 2) The workitems found on the wiki
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/TestcaseUpdates) moved to
> bugs on
> launchpad instead to enable better tracking. For example,
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1109321.
> This
> will allow us to better describe the tasks. We can tag them as
> to-do, and then assign and track and work them inside
> launchpad
> instead of the wiki.
> 3) And of course, manual testcases need to be written and
> updated :-)
>
> In addition, I'm working on a tutorial to demonstrate
> writing a
> manual testcase under the new process (similar to the
> autopilot
> tutorial). What else would you all like to see happen with
> manual
> testcases? What would help or hinder your contribution?
> Let me know
> your thoughts. Thanks!
>
>
> Nicholas
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
> <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
> <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130204/554c42e3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-quality
mailing list