Testcase not recorded

Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
Fri Apr 12 01:23:04 UTC 2013


You don't have to do it everyday :-) Let me explain a little how it 
works. When we test a specific milestone, like for example the mesa 
testing right now, we're testing a specific build with the goal of 
verifying it as stable and ready for general consumption. Images are 
tested this way too -- when we have a specific milestone like an alpha 
or beta. At the start of the milestone, the image is frozen and tested. 
If we find bugs we need to fix, we'll rebuild the image and yes, we need 
new results against the new image we built when that happens. The old 
builds will be archived and available under the history link.

However, the daily images are built automatically everyday no matter 
what. We test against them as a checkup to ensure things are running 
smooth, but we're not trying to release a specific daily until we freeze 
it, make a milestone and call for specific testing. Many folks test the 
image occasionally to see what's new, spot regressions or bugs, etc. We 
do intentionally test the images as part of our cadence testing, but 
again, that's once every couple weeks, not everyday.

So let's give some examples so you can see this in action. Again take a 
look at mesa:

http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/266/builds

There's only one build. Go ahead and click the "See removed and 
superseded builds too 
<http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/266/history>" link. 
It will only show the one build.

Now, try the same thing on unity testing from a few weeks ago:

http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/262/builds

You'll notice the last build pushed has no results -- but we did test 
it! The results are linked to the older builds. Click the "See removed 
and superseded builds too 
<http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/262/history>" link 
again. Noticed all the builds and results?

Make sense?

Nicholas

On 04/11/2013 08:33 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote:
> So you are saying that I should complete all the test procedure for a 
> particular testcase because a new image will be uploaded everyday?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Nicholas Skaggs 
> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Istimsak, I see what happened :-) New builds are posted daily, and
>     it won't show your results on today's build. If you want to see
>     them you'll need to look at yesterday's build:
>
>     Here's your results from 4/7, 4/8, and 4/9 :-)
>     http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/243/builds/41516/testcases/1300/results
>     http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/243/builds/41672/testcases/1300/results
>     http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/243/builds/41587/testcases/1300/results
>
>     Does this make sense?
>
>     Nicholas
>
>
>     On 04/11/2013 01:29 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote:
>>
>>     I started the testcase for kubuntu raring i386 and completed the
>>     "install to entire drive" procedure. When I looked back at the
>>     testcase to continue the test, I noticed the kubuntu testcase did
>>     not record my test. Is there a reason for that?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>     --
>     Ubuntu-quality mailing list
>     Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>     <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130411/319971a7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list