build

[Nicholas Skaggs]

Yikes! Yes, my mistake. I was assuming Phil was looking at the March
11th iso's, not the March 1st iso's.. That timing...

Nicholas

On 03/12/2012 02:18 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:08:14PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>> In addition, I don't believe the period in the date is intentional --
>> someone correct me if I'm wrong here :-)
>>
>> IE, 20120301.1 should actually be 201203011
> No, if the daily image gets respun, the date gets a .N suffix appended
> to it; .1 is the first respin, .2 is the second.
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20120312/3621a8c2/attachment.html>