Manual Application Testing plans for beta1

[Nicholas Skaggs]

Agreed. Use ubuntu-bug packagename and file a bug with any weirdness you
see, as part of testing the beta or not :-)  Thanks for testing!


Nicholas

On 03/05/2012 03:14 AM, Brendan Donegan wrote:
> On 04/03/12 23:28, chris hermansen wrote:
>> Two questions about beta testing:
>>
>>  1. I have found a bug outside the checkbox series; after I have
>>     entered my password on the nice new login screen, and just before
>>     the gray screen comes up as we proceed into unity 2-d, I briefly
>>     see a scrambled version of the login screen with bits of password
>>     boxes all over the screen.  Do I report this as a normal bug on
>>     Launchpad, or is there some special way of reporting a Beta bug?
>>
> I've seen something like this too. Report a normal bug in Launchpad
> against the lightdm package.
>>
>>  1. a couple of weeks ago I was preparing a large complex report with
>>     Libre Office in 11.10 and I noticed a couple of things that
>>     didn't work quite right with charts embedded in a table.  I want
>>     to test them in the new 3.5 beta in 12.04.  Do I file bug reports
>>     on Launchpad for this, or do I go upstream?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
>> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>> <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Beta1 is out! The ppa containing checkbox and some tests is
>>     available. Download the iso, load the ppa and give testing a
>>     whirl! Thanks everyone who contributed to the tests, and thanks
>>     in advance for testing.
>>
>>     http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/03/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
>>
>>     Happy Testing,
>>
>>     Nicholas
>>
>>     On 02/29/2012 05:13 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>>     Thanks Dave -- if you don't otherwise get a request in (it can
>>>     be really basic, there's a job for software center already ;-)
>>>     ), I will try and get a test written around these lines. If we
>>>     don't have this for beta1, that's ok. Beta2 should offer a much
>>>     more full set of tests -- they'll just continue to grow.
>>>
>>>     Nicholas
>>>
>>>     On 02/29/2012 06:37 AM, Dave Morley wrote:
>>>>     On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>>>     > For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on
>>>>     testing
>>>>     > our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog
>>>>     > post for more details and submit some merge requests for
>>>>     tests :-)
>>>>     > Or plan on participating and running the tests via checkbox.
>>>>     Thanks
>>>>     > everyone!
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>     http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/02/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     > Nicholas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Nicholas I would love to write a manual plan for testing software
>>>>     center but currently I am completely raced off my feet.  If I
>>>>     get some
>>>>     down time I'll have a look at throwing something together.
>>>>
>>>>     in the meantime key tests should be:
>>>>     install a gui based app
>>>>     ensure icon appears in the launcher
>>>>     sync to another pc/vm instance
>>>>     install a 0$ app (or a paid for one that utilises the ppa system)
>>>>     reinstall previous purchase on a second system
>>>>     removal of an app
>>>>     ensure icon is removed from app launcher
>>>>
>>>>     That should give you a good ground work if I don't get time
>>>>     till the
>>>>     release it out (fingers crossed I will though)
>>>>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>>     Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail.com <mailto:clhermansen at gmail.com> 
>>
>> C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20120305/f4be7ee6/attachment.html>