Meeting this week

Brendan Donegan brendan.donegan at canonical.com
Mon Jan 9 17:43:08 UTC 2012


Alex,

Having such a 'bug' lying around isn't useful, so I closed it as 
invalid. I agree we should discuss this issue of third-party software 
breaking and you're right that it has echoes of Ubuntu Friendly/Hardware 
Certification (you could say we need a type of 'Software Certification' 
as well as 'Hardware Certification')

I note that the bug reporter didn't offer the name of the commercial 
software which broke for them as well, which isn't helpful.

On 09/01/12 17:31, Alex Lourie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Gema Gomez 
> <gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com 
> <mailto:gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     thanks Phill for running the meeting last week!
>
>     I am back from holidays so I can run the meeting on Wednesday.
>     It'll be
>     a short one, though, because we are in Budapest this week on the
>     Precise
>     Rally and we have a team dinner that night.
>
>     I can give an update on what is being discussed and we can have an
>     update from what is going on in the community and on the
>     derivatives and
>     spend only 30 mins on it. If anyone has anything pressing to discuss,
>     please, bring it up at the beginning!
>
>     Best Regards,
>     Gema
>
>     --
>     Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>     Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
>
> Hi Gema, and welcome back!
>
> I'm not sure that I'll make the meeting this week, so I only wanted to 
> raise one issue: there's a bug on launchpad, 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886931.
>
> The person is complaining about the overall quality of Ubuntu (and 
> probably his specific own problems), but nevertheless, there's one 
> point that he raises that is quite important. I think that breaking 
> commercial software from working is a big problem for Ubuntu, and we 
> should do something about it.
>
> I'd love to participate in a discussion on this topic, but generally 
> the idea I had is somewhat reminiscent of Friendly - to have a list of 
> various commercial software applications tested for each new release, 
> to know where we could have a problem.
>
> So, if you decide to talk about it while I'm absent, fine, I'll read 
> logs later. If I'm present - then we could have a discussion, or just 
> start to think about it.
>
> Cheers.
>
> -- 
> Alex Lourie
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20120109/d387e745/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list