[Lubuntu-qa] ISO Testing Status

[Ron Mitchell]

I should have read this before asking for definition. It's clearer now.

Ron



On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:47:29 -0400
Nicholas Skaggs <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:

> What I've taken to calling 'cadence' testing, is the testing of the 
> daily builds of isos (specifically those focused on the desktop and 
> ubuntu) over the course of a non-milestone week, with the intent of 
> insuring the mandatory testcases for those isos pass. I know this has 
> been a difficult thing to understand, and sadly, right now the 
> isotracker doesn't allow us to do this testing in a nice and easy to see 
> way. We plan to fix this by allowing you to better browse history but 
> for now we'll have to work-around the limitation (BTW, if anyone knows 
> drupal and wishes to help land this quicker, I would be happy to help 
> set you up. We can always use more developers!).
> 
> I've put together a wiki page that I will update once a day this week 
> (about 1400 UTC, manually) with the targeted testcases and their status. 
> The page is located here.
> 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Cadence/Status
> 
> I hope this proves helpful to everyone, and as you can see we already 
> have results for many of the testcases. We need folks who have access to 
> ARM and MAC to also contribute a result for a testcase to help round us out.
> 
> As you can see, I've placed a quick summary of our progress on each of 
> the isos and testcases at the top, followed by the raw results in a 
> tabular format of those who have tested. Please don't panic if that raw 
> list is missing some of your testing! I still see the results submitted 
> from those of you who have tested server, or alt images, or another 
> flavor. For brevity's sake on this page, it's filtered to only show the 
> runs for the isos above.
> 
> I hope this helps and thank you for sticking with the testing on this. 
> ISO testing is going to continue to be something for all of us to 
> iterate upon and improve to make better. We as a community want to 
> provide solid, dependable results and good feedback, while still being 
> mindful of our efforts and time spent. Thanks,
> 
> Nicholas


-- 
Ron Mitchell <rm2892 at gmail.com>