Case Conductor requirements

[Gema Gomez]

Thank you all for the feedback, I am putting together the list to
discuss with them. I will keep you posted in case you want to join the
discussion, I still don't know which format it will be.

Gema

On 14/12/11 10:40, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I've investigated CC a little and here are some info on our requirements:
> - Test Case Definition
>    No separate field for Assumption section. I guess, we should add
> this to Description
> - Test Case ID
>    We may add this to testcase name and use as an ID
> -  Be able to have status for test cases (Draft/Under Review/Active/Inactive).
>     This is implemented. The only status missing is Under Review -
> however, several users are required for this, so I could not try this
> by myself.
> - Be able to link with launchpad defects
>   Implemented
> - Import testcases
>   Implemented, a bit buggy right now. A Gherkin-like format is used
> 
> TODO:
> - OpenID registration
> - HTML in test description/steps
> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667658)
> - Export testcases (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627785)
> 
> 
> 2011/12/13 Alex Lourie <djay.il at gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Vadim Rutkovsky <roignac at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd also like import/export functionality (in plain text, at least)
>>> and some API for advanced reporting
>>>
>>
>> +100! I forgot I wanted it too.
>>
>>>
>>> 2011/12/13 Alex Lourie <djay.il at gmail.com>:
>>>> How about test cases versioning? What is the test case needs fixing?
>>> Agree with Alex, however we may cope with it using tags (e.g.
>>> 'stable', 'for-review' etc.)
>>>
>>
>> Interesting idea. While I'd prefer versioning, tags could work in absence of
>> it.
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vadim Rutkovsky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Lourie
> 


-- 
Gema Gomez-Solano        <gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com>
QA Team                  https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd.           http://www.canonical.com