Case Conductor requirements

Alex Lourie djay.il at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 09:09:38 UTC 2011


On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Javier Domingo <javierdo1 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Very interesting and enjoying platform, I would improve going backward
> function a little more, as if done in js doesn't store the previous state.
> Its quite smart thought,
>
>
Javier Domingo
>
>
Javier

You can look at the code on github, it's still quite in development.


>
>
> 2011/12/13 Alex Lourie <djay.il at gmail.com>
>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Gema Gomez <
>> gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi QA team,
>>>
>>> I am not sure if you have all heard, but just in case. Litmus seems to
>>> be about to be substituted by a new tool the QA Mozilla team are
>>> developing. The new tool is called Case Conductor.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/TCM
>>> http://caseconductor.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>> Since they are developing this tool now, about to finish though, but
>>> still under development, they have offered to consider our requirements
>>> for the tool. January is likely to be Beta testing time for Case
>>> Conductor.
>>>
>>> I have come up with these requirements so far:
>>> - Test Case definition for us is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/TestCase
>>> (we need to be able to store test cases of that
>>> form in the tool). I already discussed this with them and didn't seem to
>>> be a problem.
>>> - Test case ID: The id need to be able to be something other than a
>>> number, ideally a predefined format of some sort.
>>> - Be able to have status for test cases (Draft/Under
>>> Review/Active/Inactive). Even though they have tags, I am not sure that
>>> is enough for tracking test cases.
>>> - Be able to link with launchpad defects
>>>
>>>
>>> In case any of you wants to start helping them:
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/case-conductor/browse_thread/thread/678a9213925a4d2f
>>>
>>> But I agreed with them that we'll be testing whenever their Beta is
>>> ready, they are re-engineering the UI at the moment and it seems a bit
>>> pointless to start testing the app before they finish this big change.
>>>
>>> If you have any other idea or requirement we could add to the list,
>>> please say so. I will check whether these things are covered already by
>>> the functionality in place or if they would be willing to add it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gema
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gema Gomez-Solano        <gema.gomez-solano at canonical.com>
>>> QA Team                  https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
>>> Canonical Ltd.           http://www.canonical.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>>
>>
>> I know that some of you already registered on the demo site, here's the
>> link https://cc.oddsites.net where one could play with Case Constructor.
>>
>> I'm liking it so far.
>>
>> --
>> Alex Lourie
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>
>>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
>


-- 
Alex Lourie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20111213/394d5830/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list