ShipIt Problems
Shane Fagan
shanepatrickfagan at ubuntu.com
Tue Jan 5 18:05:47 UTC 2010
Hi,
Im sorry you are having problems. This isnt a support list you should
ask you questions on
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
The answer to your question is very simple and its explained here
http://blog.canonical.com/?p=264
Regards
Shane Fagan
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 18:35 -0700, Sam Curl wrote:
> I'm having trouble with ShipIt: it denies all requests for a Ubuntu
> 9.10 Karmic CD. I have previously ordered the 8.04 and 9.04 CDs, and
> I want to upgrade to Karmic. Any assistance would be much
> appreciated...
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, <ubuntu-qa-request at lists.ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> Send Ubuntu-qa mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ubuntu-qa-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ubuntu-qa-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-qa digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: shipit.ubuntu.com showing incorrect info.
> (shirish ?????)
> 2. Re: Karmic_Appearance (Steve Beattie)
> 3. Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results (Joseph Salisbury)
> 4. RE: Ubuntu-qa Digest, Vol 24, Issue 2 (Kofi Anane-
> Kyeremeh)
> 5. Re: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> (josephtsalisbury at gmail.com)
> 6. Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results (Joseph Salisbury)
> 7. Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results (Dustin Kirkland)
> 8. Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results (Thierry Carrez)
> 9. Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results (Thierry Carrez)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:05:53 +0530
> From: shirish ????? <shirishag75 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: shipit.ubuntu.com showing incorrect info.
> To: Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID:
>
> <511f47f50910131235s37aa0ca8xa2b9cc1ad2565f37 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2009/10/14 Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com>:
>
> <snipped>
>
> > The Ubuntu (distribution) Quality Assurance mailing list
> isn't really
> > the appropriate place for this however you can find further
> information in
> > the bug filed about shipit:
>
> Sorry didn't know any better.
>
> > http://launchpad.net/bugs/445526.
>
> Thank you for the link.
>
> > --
> > Brian Murray ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> @ubuntu.com
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iEYEARECAAYFAkrU1AAACgkQDTAwc5ER
> +zXuegCg1RYk8SEpAYyDhp6lCeW4wSMv
> > I+0An3RJgJx3OfZEI0C+hVDIu80MYoqJ
> > =vmEp
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shirish Agarwal ????? ???????
> My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
> http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
> 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:30:27 -0700
> From: Steve Beattie <sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Karmic_Appearance
> To: Daniel Roesler <diafygi at gmail.com>
> Cc: Rakesh PK <rakeshkrishnanivas at gmail.com>,
> ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <20091013233027.GA4629 at nxnw.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:14:08PM -0500, Daniel Roesler
> wrote:
> > Is there a mail list to discuss Ubuntu appearance? I miss
> the
> > backgrounds with a stylized animal (Hardy Heron, Intrepid
> Ibex, etc.).
>
> I believe the list for discussing the ubuntu themes and
> artwork is the
> ubuntu-art list:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
> --
> Steve Beattie
> <sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: Digital signature
> Url :
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-qa/attachments/20091013/bbd4491f/attachment-0001.pgp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:50:28 -0400
> From: Joseph Salisbury <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID:
>
> <453feaee0910140450k1b92ce72r9762bc13e213071c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Thierry Carrez
> <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:
> >> I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an issue.
> I installed
> >> the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the ARCH
> variable to
> >> i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run
> euca-describe-images,
> >> I see the seventh column mention x86_64:
> >>
> >> $ euca-describe-images
> >> IMAGE emi-22F111AC
> i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
> >> admin available public x86_64 machine
> >> IMAGE eki-403116B3
> >>
> k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> >> available public x86_64 kernel
> >> IMAGE eri-23C9163C
> >>
> r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> >> available public x86_64 ramdisk
> >>
> >> Is this to be expected?
> >
> > In doubt, please file a bug about it. I'm not exactly sure
> what's
> > expected here, but it sure looks wrong to me.
> >
> > --
> > Thierry Carrez
> > Ubuntu server team
> >
>
> I'll file a bug and investigate further. Thanks for the
> information Thierry.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:29:33 +0000
> From: Kofi Anane- Kyeremeh <donscraper at hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Ubuntu-qa Digest, Vol 24, Issue 2
> To: Ubuntu Forum <ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <COL101-W18DD5E68A8824E5D26420ACEC60 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Good Day to you.
>
> I am enjoying the latest release of Ubuntu, the Ubuntu 9.04
> Desktop Edition.
>
> I need help with repositories. Any time I try to install
> software on my Ubuntu, it gives an error relating to
> repositories. I downloaded the software from www.getdeb.net. I
> also need a like to a website where I can get multimedia
> codecs for all audio an video file formats. Than you.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook
> updates, right from Hotmail?.
> http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_4:092009
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-qa/attachments/20091014/9a607034/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:06:02 +0000
> From: josephtsalisbury at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <001517741a9a9dce540475e9da20 at google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Oct 14, 2009 7:50am, Joseph Salisbury
> <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Thierry Carrez
>
> > thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> > > josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > >> I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an
> issue. I installed
>
> > >> the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the
> ARCH variable to
>
> > >> i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run
> > euca-describe-images,
>
> > >> I see the seventh column mention x86_64:
>
> > >>
>
> > >> $ euca-describe-images
>
> > >> IMAGE emi-22F111AC
> i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
>
> > >> admin available public x86_64 machine
>
> > >> IMAGE eki-403116B3
>
> > >>
> k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
>
> > >> available public x86_64 kernel
>
> > >> IMAGE eri-23C9163C
>
> > >>
> r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
>
> > >> available public x86_64 ramdisk
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Is this to be expected?
>
> > >
>
> > > In doubt, please file a bug about it. I'm not exactly sure
> what's
>
> > > expected here, but it sure looks wrong to me.
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > Thierry Carrez
>
> > > Ubuntu server team
>
> > >
>
>
>
> > I'll file a bug and investigate further. Thanks for the
> information
> > Thierry.
>
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Your updated test case corrected the issue with images being
> registered as
> x86_64 when they should be i386:
>
> $ euca-describe-images
> IMAGE eki-414A16BA
> k-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> available public i386 kernel
> IMAGE eri-24D11642
> r-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> available public i386 ramdisk
> IMAGE emi-23FE11BA
> i-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml admin
> available public i386 machine
>
> Thanks for updating the test case so quickly.
>
> I'm having an issue starting an instance, which is the last
> command in step
> 7. I still see the "disk not found" and "no domain with
> matching name
> found" errors, but I'm also seeing an error saying "no
> supported
> architecture for os type 'hvm'":
>
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] currently
> running/booting:
> i-39A80763
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt:
> internal error no
> supported architecture for os type 'hvm' (code=1)
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor
> failed to start
> domain
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: Domain
> not found:
> no domain with matching name 'i-39A80763' (code=42)
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf
> /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-39A80763/]
> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:01 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] stopping the
> network (vlan=10)
>
> I'll investigate and test further.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-qa/attachments/20091014/37576d6f/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:53:49 -0400
> From: Joseph Salisbury <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID:
>
> <453feaee0910141453w4285991du66a9f38259145f41 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Thierry Carrez
> <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:
> >> Your updated test case corrected the issue with images
> being registered
> >> as x86_64 when they should be i386:
> >>
> >> $ euca-describe-images
> >> IMAGE eki-414A16BA
> >>
> k-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> >> available public i386 kernel
> >> IMAGE eri-24D11642
> >>
> r-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> >> available public i386 ramdisk
> >> IMAGE emi-23FE11BA
> i-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
> >> admin available public i386 machine
> >>
> >> Thanks for updating the test case so quickly.
> >>
> >> I'm having an issue starting an instance, which is the last
> command in
> >> step 7. I still see the "disk not found" and "no domain
> with matching
> >> name found" errors, but I'm also seeing an error saying "no
> supported
> >> architecture for os type 'hvm'":
> >>
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] currently
> running/booting:
> >> i-39A80763
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt:
> internal error
> >> no supported architecture for os type 'hvm' (code=1)
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor
> failed to
> >> start domain
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt:
> Domain not
> >> found: no domain with matching name 'i-39A80763' (code=42)
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm
> -rf
> >> /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-39A80763/]
> >> [Wed Oct 14 14:57:01 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] stopping the
> network (vlan=10)
> >>
> >> I'll investigate and test further.
> >
> > There might be a bug trying to run EMIs registered as i386
> under
> > karmic/libvirt. A bug we wouldn't have hit before because:
> >
> > 1/ we always used euca-register without -r and that defaults
> to x86_64
> > 2/ i386 images run fine in a x86_64 VM
> >
> > Maybe something related to bug 448671.
> >
> > --
> > Thierry Carrez
> > Ubuntu server team
> >
>
> Yes my issue does look very similar to bug 448671. I can
> either stay
> with this i386 install and help test for this bug. Or, I
> could
> install x86_64 and see if the issue goes away? Do you have
> any
> preference?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:22:04 -0500
> From: Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: Joseph Salisbury <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com>
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, Thierry Carrez
> <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>,
> ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID:
>
> <d9c105ea0910141522p295dbc4rb4e38e9fdbce2474 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Joseph Salisbury
> <josephtsalisbury at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes my issue does look very similar to bug 448671. ?I can
> either stay
> > with this i386 install and help test for this bug. ?Or, I
> could
> > install x86_64 and see if the issue goes away? ?Do you have
> any
> > preference?
>
> Most of us here are testing with amd64.
>
> I actually find it interesting and useful that you're covering
> i386!
>
> :-Dustin
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:44:34 +0200
> From: Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: josephtsalisbury at gmail.com
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <4AD57352.9050105 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:
> > I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an issue. I
> installed
> > the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the ARCH
> variable to
> > i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run
> euca-describe-images,
> > I see the seventh column mention x86_64:
> >
> > $ euca-describe-images
> > IMAGE emi-22F111AC
> i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
> > admin available public x86_64 machine
> > IMAGE eki-403116B3
> >
> k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> > available public x86_64 kernel
> > IMAGE eri-23C9163C
> > r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> > available public x86_64 ramdisk
> >
> > Is this to be expected?
>
> In doubt, please file a bug about it. I'm not exactly sure
> what's
> expected here, but it sure looks wrong to me.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez
> Ubuntu server team
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:45:19 +0200
> From: Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Eucalyptus UEC-003 Test Results
> To: josephtsalisbury at gmail.com
> Cc: ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <4AD6385F.40109 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> josephtsalisbury at gmail.com wrote:
> > Your updated test case corrected the issue with images being
> registered
> > as x86_64 when they should be i386:
> >
> > $ euca-describe-images
> > IMAGE eki-414A16BA
> >
> k-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> > available public i386 kernel
> > IMAGE eri-24D11642
> > r-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml
> admin
> > available public i386 ramdisk
> > IMAGE emi-23FE11BA
> i-20091014123237/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml
> > admin available public i386 machine
> >
> > Thanks for updating the test case so quickly.
> >
> > I'm having an issue starting an instance, which is the last
> command in
> > step 7. I still see the "disk not found" and "no domain with
> matching
> > name found" errors, but I'm also seeing an error saying "no
> supported
> > architecture for os type 'hvm'":
> >
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] currently
> running/booting:
> > i-39A80763
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt:
> internal error
> > no supported architecture for os type 'hvm' (code=1)
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor
> failed to
> > start domain
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAERROR ] libvirt:
> Domain not
> > found: no domain with matching name 'i-39A80763' (code=42)
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:00 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm
> -rf
> > /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-39A80763/]
> > [Wed Oct 14 14:57:01 2009][001691][EUCAINFO ] stopping the
> network (vlan=10)
> >
> > I'll investigate and test further.
>
> There might be a bug trying to run EMIs registered as i386
> under
> karmic/libvirt. A bug we wouldn't have hit before because:
>
> 1/ we always used euca-register without -r and that defaults
> to x86_64
> 2/ i386 images run fine in a x86_64 VM
>
> Maybe something related to bug 448671.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez
> Ubuntu server team
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
>
> End of Ubuntu-qa Digest, Vol 24, Issue 6
> ****************************************
>
>
>
> --
> Samuel Curl
> Ubuntu Project Dev
> PSN:xX-SLIC500-Xx
> (480)-205-0273
More information about the Ubuntu-qa
mailing list