packaging greasemonkey scripts

markus korn thekorn at
Tue May 26 09:58:07 UTC 2009

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Mike Rooney <mrooney at> wrote:
> If this seems to work well we should figure it if we want one
> extension which contains them all, or separate extensions for each and
> a single metapackage for easy installation of all of them. Any
> opinions there?
it is good to see some work on the greasemonkey scripts!
Your extension is working fine for me, did you create this one by hand
or by using a `greasemonkey - extension compiler`?
The only question I have is: how do we ensure that this packages stay
up-to-date and work fine with every new launchpad rollout. If we
decide to support this could mean that we have to update
the scripts every week (worst case).
So I think the best idea would be to pack every script in its own package.

Greetings to Barcelona!

More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list