Ubuntu-qa Digest, Vol 7, Issue 2

Andrew keen101 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 9 18:51:41 UTC 2008

OK, fair enough. I see the logic in that. However, I don't think regular
users should have the ability to mark ideas as duplicates. I think there
should be a 'report duplicate' or something, but should have a moderator
review it.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Stéphane Graber <stgraber at ubuntu.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
Hash: SHA1

Dave Morley wrote:
> I think there is a danger then of the better written example being
> ignored.  I think that the best written should be the lead with all
> others being marked as duplicates of it.  That would ensure that the
> report had the best chance of gaining votes and being understood.


Dave is right, we indeed try to select the best idea based on its
description, the items it's linked to or the comments and not simply on
the date it's been proposed.

I don't think that automatizing this process is something we want to do.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20080409/200a2ac5/attachment.html>

More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list