[Bug 1880959] Re: Rules from the policy directory files are not reapplied after changes to the primary policy file

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package python-oslo.policy - 3.2.0-0ubuntu2

---------------
python-oslo.policy (3.2.0-0ubuntu2) groovy; urgency=medium

  * d/p/reload-policy-files.patch: Cherry-picked from upstream master
    to ensure policy directory files are reapplied after change to primary
    policy file (LP: #1880959).

 -- Corey Bryant <corey.bryant at canonical.com>  Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:47:11
-0400

** Changed in: python-oslo.policy (Ubuntu Groovy)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880959

Title:
  Rules from the policy directory files are not reapplied after changes
  to the primary policy file

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive mitaka series:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens series:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive rocky series:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive stein series:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive train series:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri series:
  Triaged
Status in oslo.policy:
  Fix Released
Status in python-oslo.policy package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in python-oslo.policy source package in Xenial:
  Triaged
Status in python-oslo.policy source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in python-oslo.policy source package in Eoan:
  Won't Fix
Status in python-oslo.policy source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Based on the investigation here https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-keystone/+bug/1880847 it was determined that rules from policy files located in the directory specified in the policy_dirs option (/etc/<config_dir>/policy.d by default) are not re-applied after the rules from the primary policy file is re-applied due to a change.

  This leads to scenarios where incorrect rule combinations are active.

  Example from the test case in 1880847:

  * policy.json gets read with the following rule;
      "identity:list_credentials": "rule:admin_required or user_id:%(user_id)s",
  * rule.yaml from policy.d is read with the following rule;
  {'identity:list_credentials': '!'}
  * policy.json's mtime gets updated (with or without a content change) and overrides the rule to be
      "identity:list_credentials": "rule:admin_required or user_id:%(user_id)s",
  * rule.yaml doesn't get reapplied since it hasn't changed.

  [Test Case]
  == ubuntu ==

  The patches include unit tests that ensure the code is behaving as
  expected and has not regressed. These tests are run during every
  package build.

  == upstream ==
  For a particular version of oslo.policy:

  * put the attached test (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
  /python-
  oslo.policy/+bug/1880959/+attachment/5377753/+files/test_1880959.py)
  under oslo_policy/tests/test_1880959.py;

  * run tox -e cover -- oslo_policy.tests.test_1880959.EnforcerTest;
  * observe the failure;
  # ...
  testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: 'role:fakeA' != 'rule:admin'
  Ran 1 tests in 0.005s (+0.001s)
  FAILED (id=1, failures=1)

  * apply the patch;
  * run tox -e cover -- oslo_policy.tests.test_1880959.EnforcerTest
  * observe that the failure is no longer there.

  [Regression Potential]
  The regression potential is low given that there is test coverage in the olso.policy unit tests.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1880959/+subscriptions