[Bug 1804062] Re: test_hacking fails for python 3.6.7 and newer

OpenStack Infra 1804062 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sat Aug 10 01:20:51 UTC 2019


Reviewed:  https://review.opendev.org/665790
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=dc2963d2a0002d4ddacf50b1f80c470d5de7ec61
Submitter: Zuul
Branch:    stable/queens

commit dc2963d2a0002d4ddacf50b1f80c470d5de7ec61
Author: Stephen Finucane <sfinucan at redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 12 15:10:59 2019 +0100

    Fix double word hacking test
    
    At present, 'pycodestyle' feeds the following string into the 'tokenizer'
    library:
    
        ["'This is the the best comment'"]
    
    (note the added quotes because this isn't valid Python otherwise)
    
    On previous versions of Python, this tokenizer would parse the string like so:
    
      (3, "'This is the the best comment'", (1, 0), (1, 30), "'This is the the best comment'")
      (0, '', (2, 0), (2, 0), '')
    
    where (3 = 'STRING', 0 = 'ENDMARKER')
    
    However, with the fix [1] backported to recent versions of Python, this now
    resolves to:
    
      (3, "'This is the the best comment'", (1, 0), (1, 30), "'This is the the best comment'")
      (4, '', (1, 30), (1, 31), '')
      (0, '', (2, 0), (2, 0), '')
    
    where (3 = 'STRING', 4 = 'NEWLINE', 0 = 'ENDMARKER')
    
    Typically, 'pycodestyle' will run physical line checks on each line as it
    parses the token:
    
      https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/blob/2.5.0/pycodestyle.py#L2036
    
    For the former case above, the line doesn't include a newline which
    means we never parse a 'NEWLINE' token with a logical line (the fifth
    element of the token tuple) corresponding to our full line. This means
    we don't here but that wasn't an issue previously since there's a
    fallthrough case that handled tokens remaining at the end of the parse:
    
      https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/blob/2.5.0/pycodestyle.py#L2114-L2116
    
    Unfortunately, because we now have an additional newline character to
    parse, one that's on a separate line to our test string no less, we run
    logical checks on it:
    
      https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/blob/2.5.0/pycodestyle.py#L2105-L2107
    
    This is an issue since the logical check wipes stored tokens meaning
    we've nothing to check when we get to the fallthrough case:
    
      https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/blob/2.5.0/pycodestyle.py#L2012
    
    This fixes changes things so that a newline is included (and also adds
    quotes so it's valid Python, but that's mostly unrelated). This means we
    end up with the following instead:
    
      ["'This is the the best comment'\n"]
    
    On both Python without the bugfix and with it, this parses as:
    
      (3, "'This is the the best comment'", (1, 0), (1, 30), "'This is the the best comment'\n")
      (4, '\n', (1, 30), (1, 31), "'This is the the best comment'\n")
      (0, '', (2, 0), (2, 0), '')
    
    where (3 = 'STRING', 4 = 'NEWLINE', 0 = 'ENDMARKER')
    
    Which triggers things in 'pycodestyle' correctly.
    
      https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle/blob/2.5.0/pycodestyle.py#L2044-L2046
    
    This isn't _really_ a fix since there's clearly still a bug in either
    'pycodestyle' or Python (I think the latter, since it's adding a newline
    to a file that explicitly doesn't have one), but the chances of us
    hitting this bug in practice are rather low - you'd need to make a
    mistake on the very last line of a file without a newline at the end
    which is something Vim, for example, won't even let you do without
    setting special flags - and therefore it can be reasonably ignored.
    
    [1] https://bugs.python.org/issue33899
    
    Change-Id: Ia597594e0469c0e83d7ad22b0678390aaebaffe7
    Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <sfinucan at redhat.com>
    Closes-Bug: #1804062
    (cherry picked from f545a25cc443c41dcd9bdd028064c28b53f56037)
    (cherry picked from commit 0cb6106b83c33bded9e6cdec7737964c36be8de5)
    (cherry picked from commit 4858074c89838eadeb9eaf9f39917e9fb90acd93)


** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
       Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804062

Title:
  test_hacking fails for python 3.6.7 and newer

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens series:
  Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive rocky series:
  Fix Committed
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive stein series:
  Fix Committed
Status in masakari:
  New
Status in OpenStack Compute (nova):
  Fix Released
Status in nova package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nova source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in nova source package in Cosmic:
  Triaged
Status in nova source package in Disco:
  Triaged
Status in nova source package in Eoan:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The check for double words in test_hacking is failing in python 3.6.7
  (released in ubuntu 18.04 within the last few days) and in new
  versions of 3.7.x. This is is because of this change to python:
  https://bugs.python.org/issue33899 .

  This is causing failures in python 36 unit tests for nova.

  The fix ought to be adding a newline to the code sample. Maybe.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1804062/+subscriptions



More information about the Ubuntu-openstack-bugs mailing list