[Bug 1480275] Re: add 'vip' handling for non-HA deploys

James Page james.page at ubuntu.com
Thu Feb 23 18:45:59 UTC 2017


** Changed in: charm-cinder
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: charm-cinder
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cinder (Juju Charms Collection)
       Status: Triaged => Invalid

** Changed in: charm-glance
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: charm-glance
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: glance (Juju Charms Collection)
       Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to cinder in Juju Charms Collection.
Matching subscriptions: charm-bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480275

Title:
  add 'vip' handling for non-HA deploys

Status in OpenStack ceilometer charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack cinder charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack glance charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack keystone charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack neutron-api charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack nova-cloud-controller charm:
  Triaged
Status in OpenStack openstack-dashboard charm:
  Triaged
Status in ceilometer package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in cinder package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in glance package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in keystone package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in neutron-api package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in nova-cloud-controller package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in openstack-dashboard package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Invalid
Status in swift-proxy package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  It would be useful if 'vip' could be handled in a nonHA way
  (ie without a related hacluster subordinate).

  This could be handled by the charm itself, by adding the
  vip as an ip alias to the highest numbered unit (and removing
  it from the previous unit, if any) if a setting like
  'non-ha-vip' is True.

  FWIW from ~ expected usage, I'd suggest above approach
  vs leadership election, to prefer the fresh-er units for
  the vip, specially for the single-unit case where you'd
  want to 'replace' an existing unit (add-unit + remove-unit
  previous one).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-ceilometer/+bug/1480275/+subscriptions



More information about the Ubuntu-openstack-bugs mailing list