[Bug 1098314] Re: pg_num inappropriately low on new pools

[James Page]

Marking this as Won't Fix; newer charm versions do much better pg calcs,
and for direct users of the packaging, its possible to set default pg
and pgp nums in configuration (for which we don't provide a default).

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

** Changed in: cloud-archive
       Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098314

Title:
  pg_num inappropriately low on new pools

Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
  Won't Fix
Status in ceph package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Version: 0.48.2-0ubuntu2~cloud0

  On a Ceph cluster with 18 OSDs, new object pools are being created
  with a pg_num of 8.  Upstream recommends that there be more like 100
  or so PGs per OSD: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-
  systems.ceph.devel/10242

  I've worked around this by removing and recreating the pools with a
  higher pg_num before we started using the cluster, but since we aim
  for fully automated deployment (using Juju and MaaS) this is
  suboptimal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1098314/+subscriptions