[Bug 1599636] Re: pause failing on HA deployment: haproxy is running

[James Page]

Infact pausing the hacluster subordinate first is really important as
that will ensure that any virtual IP's are also moved to different units
in the cluster.

That said, the principle should really know that its no longer in charge
of haproxy, and report the correct status.

** Changed in: ceilometer (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: ceph-radosgw (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: cinder (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: glance (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: keystone (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: neutron-api (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: openstack-dashboard (Juju Charms Collection)
   Importance: High => Low

** Changed in: ceilometer (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.07

** Changed in: cinder (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

** Changed in: ceph-radosgw (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.07

** Changed in: ceph-radosgw (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: 16.07 => 16.10

** Changed in: ceilometer (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: 16.07 => 16.10

** Changed in: glance (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

** Changed in: keystone (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

** Changed in: neutron-api (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

** Changed in: nova-cloud-controller (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

** Changed in: openstack-dashboard (Juju Charms Collection)
    Milestone: None => 16.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to cinder in Juju Charms Collection.
Matching subscriptions: charm-bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1599636

Title:
  pause failing on HA deployment: haproxy is running

Status in ceilometer package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in ceph-radosgw package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in cinder package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in glance package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in keystone package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in neutron-api package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in nova-cloud-controller package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged
Status in openstack-dashboard package in Juju Charms Collection:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I have an HA mitaka cloud (deployed with autopilot), and am checking
  the pause/resume actions of its units.

  When trying to "action pause" the units of most services that use
  hacluster (keystone, cinder, neutron-api, ceilometer, nova-cloud-
  controller, ceph-radosgw and less often openstack-dashboard), the
  action fails *most of the time* because haproxy is running. "juju
  action pause" tries to stop haproxy service, but once
  pacemaker/corosync detects haproxy isn't running, the service is
  restarted. haproxy is never really stopped and the action fails.

  Keystone example:
  $ juju action fetch 783e4ee0-a498-42e3-8448-45ac26f6a847
  message: 'Couldn''t pause: Services should be paused but these services running: haproxy, these ports which should be closed, but are open: 5000, 35357, Paused. Use ''resume'' action to resume normal service.'
  status: failed

  juju logs excerpt for the paused unit:
  https://pastebin.canonical.com/160484/

  juju status of the whole environment:
  https://pastebin.canonical.com/160483/

  /var/log/syslog excerpt right after juju action pause is issued:
  https://pastebin.canonical.com/160379/

  The actions for these services sometimes work, but vast majority
  attempts fail. This could indicate that something incidental is been
  relied upon (e.g. assuming network is "fast" enough that races aren't
  an issue).

  Output of a script that pauses and resumes one unit per service to
  check the behavior: https://pastebin.canonical.com/160490/. Notice
  that neutron-api despite failing the action reports the unit as
  successfully paused shortly after.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/ceilometer/+bug/1599636/+subscriptions