Shutting down some community infrastructure

Max Horlanchuk max.horlanchuk at canonical.com
Tue Oct 4 00:17:01 UTC 2022


Hi Philipp,

We are still looking into details on how this can be done but we are
not going to upgrade in place. planet.u.c will be migrated to more up
to date platform. We don't expect any significant downtime (if any).
I'll let you know closer to the date when we are ready to run this
migration.

Thanks,

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:11 AM Philipp Kewisch
<philipp.kewisch at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Erich,
>
> thanks for responding. I'm glad you agree on shutting down pad and
> screencasts. Regarding planet, I'm also reluctant to make any changes
> there and would like to keep it running. I'm adding in the news team as
> well so they are aware. If we stay with the option of doing an in-place
> upgrade, it might be down for a bit while the team figures out why it is
> no longer working. I suspect the issues might be around dependency problems.
>
> We might be able to define a period of time that we find acceptable for
> the service to be temporarily down? Kristofer/Max, if the in-place
> upgrade fails, is there a time you could commit to for getting the
> service back up and running? Is there any way the community could help
> testing prior to the upgrade to make sure that it still works as
> expected? Could you share which software is running planet for Ubuntu?
>
> I know Mozilla still runs a planet instance
> (https://github.com/mozilla-it/planet.mozilla.org) as well, so it should
> not be impossible to do, it just might not be as straightforward to get
> a replacement running. Best case the upgrade works without hickups and
> we are safe.
>
> Philipp
>
> Am 30.09.22 um 16:44 schrieb Erich Eickmeyer:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > Seeing as how you never actually got a response to these points, I figured I'd
> > share the thoughts I'd been having.
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 1:55:40 PM PDT Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> >> Hello Community Council,
> >>
> >> in an effort to reduce attack surface we'd like to shut down some
> >> services that are running on old infrastructure or are not well patched:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> Separately, another service where action is required is
> >> planet.ubuntu.com. The software used to aggregate the information is
> >> running on outdated infrastucture. We will need to update, replace or
> >> decommission the service before November 1st. The update would be in
> >> place, so "fingers crossed it will still work after upgrading to a newer
> >> Ubuntu". A replacement won't be possible with our resources in this
> >> short timeframe. I would hate to decommission it, since I am interested
> >> in providing more information about the community, not less. In short, I
> >> don't have a great answer for planet, so I'd love to hear from folks if
> >> you have ideas.
> > Shutting down Planet would be very bad for the community. I think the UWN
> > folks would definitely have trouble with this one mostly as this is where they
> > gather a ton of their news. I definitely object to decommissioning it and think
> > we or others need to come up with a replacement if the update breaks it. I
> > know other communities, such as Fedora and KDE, have a similar "Planet", which
> > might even be running on the same software. So, I'm sure we're not alone and
> > that we can come up with a solution, but I feel like there's less of a chance
> > things will break due to an update on this one.
> >
> > Those are my thoughts.



-- 
Max Horlanchuk
Engineering Manager - SRE
Canonical



More information about the ubuntu-news-team mailing list