Interview with Dustin Kirkland on Encrypted Private Directories
james.westby at ubuntu.com
Thu Oct 23 14:20:53 BST 2008
Hi news team,
Below is an interview that we would like to go on the fridge,
could you help us do what is necessary to achieve that. We'd
like to get a couple of screenshots in as well, but I haven't
taken them yet.
I'd appreciate any ideas about how to introduce the interview.
Once the release is done with we will start to interview some
> One thing you have worked on for Intrepid is Encrypted
> Private directories. Could you tell us a little about what they
> are, and why they might be useful to someone?
If you have sensitive, personal data on a laptop computer, and you
travel anywhere with it, you should seriously consider some form of
encryption to protect that data.
Perhaps you have used a LiveCD to recover data off of a broken system
before... Did you have to enter any passwords to access that data?
What's to prevent someone from "borrowing" your computer for a few
minutes (or stealing the whole thing), booting a LiveCD, reading your
documents, mail, and keys? Encryption can protect your data...if you
>From a server perspective, many machines today have hot-swappable disks.
A thief can flip a latch, yank a disk out, and be on his way. That is
perhaps a bit far fetched, but it happens. And if your server is
running a RAID, it might be many hours or days before you notice a disk
is missing. Again, without encryption, a thief has transparent access
to all of your data.
There are many different ways you can use encryption to protect your
data. You can use gpg  to individually encrypt/decrypt individual
files, but that would get cumbersome if you need to encrypt a lot of
Ubuntu supports encrypting the entire disk using LVM+LUKS , however
there can be a performance penalty for encrypting *everything*, it's not
easy to conduct incremental backups of the encrypted data, and you have
to enter a password just to boot the system. The latter point is a
show-stopper in most server environments, where the system is required
to boot unattended in a data center or lab.
Ideally (at least in my mind), each user's entire home directory would
be encrypted using a key that's unique to them. It would be mounted
when the user logs in, and unmounted when the user logs out. That was
my original proposal for Intrepid, but this was deemed a bit too
ambitious to accomplish within a single release. The compromise was to
provide a single encrypted location inside of each user's home
Then, each time the user logs in (graphically, on the console, or via
ssh), their "login passphrase" is used to decrypt the second "mount
passphrase". This "mount passphrase" is used to establish the ~/Private
mountpoint, where the user can read and write their most sensitive data.
This merely a mountpoint, though. The data, when written to disk, is
stored in ~/.Private. Try reading any file in there and you'll find
that data is encrypted! You can incrementally backup ~/.Private using
rsync  (or some other backup program) to remote, untrusted storage,
without giving the administrators of that remote system access to your
> Do they provide complete security of the data that is stored in
> them? What technologies does this feature make use of?
As with any good encryption scheme, the security of the data stored
within an encrypted ~/Private directory is only as strong as long as
your passphrases are secret and hard to guess. By default,
a 128-bit random mount passphrase is generated, which should be
considered relatively strong. This mount passphrase is
then encrypted using your login passphrase, and so your login
passphrase must be strong as well.
N.B. It is *essential* that you record your mount passphrase and
store it somewhere safe. If you ever have to manually recover
your data, you will need this passphrase, rather than your login
Encrypted ~/Private directories in Ubuntu use eCryptfs as the
cryptographic filesystem scheme. eCryptfs first appeared as a
filesystem module in the Linux kernel in November of 2006, in the 2.6.19
release. eCryptfs uses the vetted cryptographic algorithms in the Linux
kernel (AES, by default in Ubuntu), as well as the kernel keyring for
per-user key management. Thus, I would argue that eCryptfs is built on top
of established technologies.
The biggest current shortcoming is that while all file contents are
encrypted, filenames are not (Bug #264977). The upstream kernel
developer responsible for ecryptfs, Michael Halcrow if IBM, is currently
pursuing this at a high priority, and has some working code that should
make it into the Linux kernel soon. I think Jaunty is a realistic
timeframe, for Ubuntu.
If you're logged out, and the ~/Private directory is not
mounted, it impossible for even the root user to mount your
encrypted data without the appropriate passphrases. However,
when ~/Private is mounted, normal filesystem permissions apply.
The ~/Private directory is set up so that other non-privileged
users should not be able to read the data. However, the root user
may be able to. To solve this problem, eCryptfs needs integration with
technology that provides Mandatory Access Controls, such as AppArmor
and/or SELinux (Bug #278290).
> Are my passwords from Firefox stored in there for example?
Ubuntu doesn't put any data in ~/Private automatically. We felt that
most people would have taken offense at any forced migration of data
On the other hand, I've blogged about some of the data that I store in
my encrypted ~/Private . Basically, I've moved my user data
directories of Evolution, GPG, Firefox, Pidgin, SSH, and XChat to
~/Private, and established symbolic links in their usual locations.
I think this is a pretty sensible setup, but I recommend each user
consciously choose what goes into their ~/Private directory.
> How do I set up an encrypted private directory for myself?
$ sudo apt-get install ecryptfs-utils
Setup your private directory
Enter your login password, and either choose a mount pass phrase or
generate one. Record both pass phrases in a safe location!!! They will
be required if you ever have to recover your data manually.
Logout, and Log back in to establish the mount
$ mount | grep Private
Make sure that the application whose data you want to protect (e.g.
Firefox or Evolution) is not running
$ ps -ef | grep firefox
Move the application's data directory (e.g. ~/.mozilla or ~/.evolution)
into your ~/Private directory
$ mv ~/.mozilla ~/Private
Establish a symbolic link from the old location to new location
$ ln -s ~/Private/.mozilla ~/.mozilla
Repeat for each of your most sensitive data directories.
N.B. If you put all of .ssh in ~/Private, you won't be able to
ssh into the system using public key authentication. In this
case, you might want to only put your private key in ~/Private,
and leave the rest in the clear.
N.B. DO NOT PUT ~/.ecryptfs/ in ~/Private! There's a
bootstrapping issue. ~/.ecryptfs/* are required to establish
the mount. If those are not readable prior to establishing the
mount, ~/Private cannot be mounted.
We have also added an option to the alternate and server
installer, just after choosing a username and password, to
optionally setup an encrypted ~/Private directory.
> What did you as an Ubuntu developer have to do to bring this
> feature to Ubuntu users?
First, I created a Blueprint in Launchpad . Then, I created a
Specification design document in the wiki . I used this to fuel a
discussion at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Prague in May of 2008. I
refined the design document according to the feedback I got at UDS.
Next, I discussed the design thoroughly with a number of people, both on
the Ubuntu side, as well as with the upstream eCryptfs project. I used
IRC and the mailing lists to hash out some issues. And I started
implementing it incrementally and in stages. I tracked the progress on
the wiki page, and actively responded to questions in the wiki and in
I posted all changes as patches to the eCryptfs mailing list, and worked
all of my code into the eCryptfs upstream git tree . As soon as each
batch of patches was accepted, I would request a new release tarball of
ecryptfs-utils from the upstream maintainer (Michael Halcrow). Then I'd
request the Debian ecryptfs-utils maintainer (Daniel Baumann) sync the
Debian unstable ecryptfs-utils package to the new upstream release.
Finally, I'd merge the Debian package into Ubuntu and request
Also, I filed Main Inclusion Reports  for ecryptfs-utils and a number
of its dependencies, in order to be in main and used in the installer.
As a prerequisite, some of the source code was reviewed by various Ubuntu
developers, including Kees Cook, Jamie Strandboge, Steve Langasek, and
Martin Pitt. My thanks to them for their careful review. Colin Watson
helped integrate the questions into the alternate and server installers.
It was about this time I discovered planet.ubuntu.com and "blogging".
Using my blog, I was able to generate some publicity around the feature
and call for testing. The feedback was almost overwhelming, but with the
help of the outstanding Ubuntu community, we did shake out and fix some
Based on my contributions to Ubuntu through ecryptfs-utils (as well as a
number of other packages), I was able to apply for and attain MOTU
privileges in the Ubuntu community.
And as a result to my active contribution to ecryptfs-utils upstream, I
was added as a maintainer to the ecryptfs project.
> You say you were accepted as a MOTU due in part to your work on this
> feature, that implies that you implemented this without having
> upload rights to Ubuntu. Is that correct?
Correct. At the beginning of the Intrepid development cycle,
ecryptfs-utils was in Universe, and I did not have upload privileges.
Jamie Strandboge, Kees Cook, and Chuck Short sponsored many uploads of
Just about the time that I was granted upload rights to Universe,
ecryptfs-utils was moved to Main, where I do not (yet) have upload
privileges. So I still need to push my changes to the Ubuntu package
through an Ubuntu Core Developer. I hope to apply for Core Dev in the
On the other hand, I am now an upstream co-maintainer of eCryptfs, and I
have commit privileges against the upstream git repository.
> Did you examine any other approaches to solving this? Why
> did you pick this particular one?
Among the other options I reviewed, I considered eCryptfs to be the most
promising. It's a filesystem in the Linux kernel, giving
optimal performance, thorough peer review, and standard implementation.
The development community is active and established. I have been privy
to the overall design of eCryptfs since 2004, from my previous role as a
security developer in the IBM Linux Technology Center.
A more comprehensive review of eCryptfs against other implementations
(albeit biased) is available at .
I will note that it would be possible for a motivated Ubuntu developer
to modify my Encrypted Private implementation to use a different
underlying encryption scheme for ~/Private. I would actually encourage
more development in this space, as I think choice is good for the Ubuntu
community. I could easily see an Encrypted Private directory that uses,
say, EncFS instead of eCryptfs. I wouldn't necessarily work on it
myself, but I would encourage such development.
> Where can people go if they want to find out more? Are there
> any tasks that they can help with?
Start with the design specification . Join the ecryptfs-users
community in Launchpad . Consider helping with upstream eCryptfs
I've focused mainly on the server space, and on the command-line only.
I would love to get some help from more desktop oriented developers for
better integration with the Gnome and KDE desktops. Nautilus,
Konqueror, etc. There's an effort to create a graphical interface for
setting up an encrypted private directory. I would love to see
something under System->Preferences->Encryption and Keyrings that
allowed a user to setup their private directory right there.
> Do you have any plans to improve this feature in future releases?
Upstream ecryptfs kernel development is working on encrypted filenames.
We'll want to help integrate and test that in Ubuntu. I expect this
should make it into Jaunty.
I mentioned above that more graphical setup tools would be useful, for
configuration and setup, and integration directly into the file
managers. I'd like to see a similar option in the graphical installer
for what we have in the alternate and server installers.
I plan on pitching encrypted home directories again at UDS. I hope to
use the relative success of encrypted ~/Private to bolster my case.
There will be problems to solve, of course. But that's what discussions
Finally, we really need encrypted swap by default. Swap can be a
treasure trove of passphrases and keys on a system. I would like to see
swap encrypted by default, with a randomly generated key every boot.
This should be relatively easy to do, with most of the work needing to
be done in the installers. Resuming from suspend and hibernate might
take some new new magic, but I think it should be doable.
Otherwise, I'm open to suggestions. Please file wishlist bugs
* Upstream ecryptfs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs
* Ubuntu's ecryptfs-utils:
More information about the Ubuntu-news-team