[ubuntu-mythtv] Proposing idea: Mythbuntu 7.10.1

[Nick Fox]

I agree here. +1 for Service Release.

On Nov 29, 2007 10:07 AM, Thomas Mashos <thomas at weilandhomes.com> wrote:

> I don't have a problem with it, although I wish we didn't have to do it.
> I do think that it is a necessary evil though and wont cause too much
> confusion.  Perhaps for the next cycle we'll have more testers and get
> more bug reports (or better bug reports).
>
> Lets just make sure that if we do, that current users only need to
> enable that repo, and that this is more of a mythbuntu 7.10-fixes.
> although adding fixes sounds bad.  Maybe Mythbuntu 7.10+backports and a
> BOLD snippet that says current users just need to enable that repo.
>
>
>
> +1 for 7.10.1, but just once.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 23:55 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > Hi Everyone:
> >
> > After seeing a lot of issues on the forums cropping up over and over, I
> > was considering doing a follow up release.
> >
> > This follow up release could reflect some of the bigger bugs that were
> > discovered, such as the mythtv pvr-350 output problems, the pvr-350 lirc
> > configuration, requiring the CD to install a few things after install,
> > and anything else that we have (or would like to backport back from
> > hardy).  At very least, it would make sure that these things aren't
> > posted on the forums and forced to be marked duplicate time and time
> again.
> >
> > As long as we make it clear that all of these things are available via
> > the backports repository as well, I think it would probably be a good
> idea.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list
> Ubuntu-mythtv at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-mythtv/attachments/20071129/a9de445e/attachment.htm