[ubuntu-mythtv] [Bug 65174] Re: Installing Lirc support should be simpler
Brian J. Murrell
brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Mon Jul 23 12:23:41 BST 2007
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:24 +0000, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Brian: it seems that m-a is not so much immature as "only" badly integrated in Ubuntu...
No, I disagree. I don't think it's any different than it is in Debian.
It's just the way the tool works. It's "sub-optimal" (if you don't want
to use the word "immature").
> Feature-wise you can run "m-a a-i lirc" and get working LIRC modules
Indeed. But why should I have to (remember (how) to do this every time
the kernel is upgraded)?
> (it asks a few times in the process for a "y" whether you want to
install kernel-headers and bla bla, and then automatically installs
kernel-headers and build-essentials).
Yup. More stuff I should not have to (remember (how) to do).
> What's lacking is some GTK GUI integration which hides the "y"
Nope. Completely wrong solution, IMHO.
> and maybe it would be nice if m-a would then be run automatically at
every kernel upgrade...
Ahh. Now you are talking about the _maturity_ of DKMS. Instead of
trying to wrangle m-a to do exactly what DKMS actually does, why not
just use DKMS. Probably DKMS could be made to simply call m-a if that's
the way you really wanted to go with it.
> It's not lacking very much, in fact it only seems to lack an end-user
Again, I disagree. A GUI is the wrong solution. Automation, hidden
from the poor end-user is the right solution.
Or as Mario says in a followup, integration with linux-ubuntu-modules,
so that binary modules come out of the box.
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.
Brian J. Murrell
Installing Lirc support should be simpler
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MythTV
Ubuntu Maintainers, which is a bug contact for lirc in ubuntu.
More information about the Ubuntu-mythtv