[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Draft Mozilla extension packaging policy

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Sat Aug 15 18:45:43 BST 2009

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:50:02PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Following up on this old thread:
> On 06/30/2009 04:32 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:17:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> I'd say putting the extensions there now would be future-proof and the
> >> best thing to do IMHO. Then we could put links in
> >> /usr/share/iceweasel/extensions of
> >> /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{app-id}. I'd be more in favour of the
> >> latter, especially considering the app-id is in install.rdf, and we
> >> don't need to keep a list of app-id <-> locations mappings.
> > 
> > OK, so consent is to use "mozilla" location with xul-ext- prefix?
> I think this was the closest we reached to consensus, though the
> xul-ext- package name prefix itself was considered dubious by some folks.
> I've updated http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam to correct
> the location to match Mike Hommey's suggestion.  I'd appreciate folks
> checking to make sure that i got it right.
> I tried to figure out what iceape's app-id was for the example, but it
> doesn't look to me like iceape-browser is actually looking anywhere in
> /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/ during startup.  so at the moment, i just
> left the documentation with ??? for that reference.  if anyone knows how
> it should be fixed up, please have at it!

iceape 1.1.x doesn't have an extensions manager and has to be treated

It will be different with iceape 2.0, though.


More information about the Ubuntu-mozillateam mailing list