Bug report: "No description found in plugin database" when choosing flash plugin

[John Vivirito]

Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:33:29AM -0400, John Vivirito wrote:
>   
>> Simeon Maxein wrote:
>>     
>>> I've upgraded from Hardy (virtually unused) to the Intrepid alpha
>>> today via update-manager -d. Now I've visited a web page that requires
>>> flash, and Firefox offers me three choices of flash plugins (Adobe,
>>> SWFDec and Gnash), each one subtitled with the text "No description
>>> found in plugin database" and a request to report a bug on this list.
>>>       
>> Please report the bug at bugs.launchpad.net I'm not sure what is the
>> issue can you please file the bug and give as much detail as you can.
>> Normally its good practice to include as much detail including step by
>> step instruction on how to reproduce, package and version of packages
>> (including browser in this case and ubufox version) the results you get
>> when you reproduce the problem and what you expect should happen.
>>     
>>> "No description found in plugin database"
>>>       
>> If so what do you think it should have/say
>>
>>     
>
> This reports means that the debian/control fields lacks a good plugin
> description in form of a Npp-Description: header. I will take care
> that this happens for all main plugin classes (e.g. flash + java).
>
> I will send some details on this the other day.
>
>  - Alexander
>
>
>   
Thanks

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from UnforgivenIII


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-mozillateam/attachments/20081014/88cd9df6/attachment.pgp