[Bug 1271513]

[Rafamdn]

Also, regarding the error "BR certificates must not contain
directoryName type alternative name", it has been discussed yet at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.security.policy/7wIZmwp4qGQ.

As it was commented, our certificates are compliant with this
requirement as we set the Domain Name (there is at least a DNSName).
Also, in order to comply with all applicable law related to eGovernment
and identification of eOffices, administrative ID info must be set at
SAN extension. As stating at section 8 of BRs we are oblied to do so.

Even if you look at CABForum EV Guidelines (9.2.2), about Subject Alternative Name it is just said:
 "This extension MUST contain one or more host Domain Name(s) owned or controlled by the Subject and to be associated with the Subject’s server. Such server MAY be owned and operated by the Subject or another entity (e.g., a hosting service). Wildcard certificates are not allowed for EV Certificates.

You'll agree that this is a less restrictive assertion (and it's about
EV certificates wich are more sensitive and requirements are harder) and
it should be taken into account.

I suggest to change the error message to a warning in order to allow CAs
to explain its especial circumstances.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mozilla
Bugs, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1271513

Title:
  www.cert.fnmt.es certificates are not included in Mozilla products

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1271513/+subscriptions