[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

[Andrew]

It would be nice if there was a very brief piece of text that appeared
just above the eula explaining that the eula is a requirement of Mozilla
Corp and that that those who did not wish to be bound by it could use
abrowser instead, and an apturl link to abrowser could be included. I
think the explanation is necessary as the eula feels very 'unubuntuy' in
fact at first I assumed that its presence was the result of a packaging
bug. It would also be nice if there was an obvious way to find the
licence again, for those like me who agree in haste, and later want to
find out what it was they agreed to. I appreciate the need for the eula,
but its presence was really jarring, and the CAPITALS made it worse.

-- 
AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mozilla
Bugs, which is subscribed to firefox-3.0 in ubuntu.