[Bug 43324] Re: There is no 64 bit package available.

[Adam Petaccia]

Should we begin to transition package names for i386 archs as well?  I
think that might make life a little more easier than the overall picture
we currently have now.  I.E:  i386 can install wine32 (wine becomes a
transition package for a release), while AMD64 users have their choice
of wine64 or wine32.  Also, I can't find the resource, but I seem to
recall there being issues with what if a 64-bit application expects to
call a 32 bit one.  This would require both wine64 and wine32, which I
don't believe are parallel installable at the moment.  Also, see
http://winehq.org/?issue=318 for a few more issues with `wine64'.

So long story short, we may want to transition to calling our package
"wine32" on all archs, even though "wine64" probably won't come around
for a while (yes, even though it does compile).

-- 
There is no 64 bit package available.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mozilla
Bugs, which is a bug contact for firefox in ubuntu.