2009/4/9 Stefan Potyra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stefan.potyra@informatik.uni-erlangen.de">stefan.potyra@informatik.uni-erlangen.de</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi Iain,<br> <br> Am Thursday 09 April 2009 12:33:04 schrieb Iain Lane:<br> <div class="im">> On 9 Apr 2009, at 08:39, Steve Langasek wrote:<br> > > Uploads to universe should again follow the guidelines described here:<br> > ><br> > > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html</a><br> <br> </div>first off the delegates changed a little bit for jaunty, see<br> <br> <<a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-February/000533.html" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-February/000533.html</a>><br> <br> for the current list.<br> <br> Being in FinalFreeze, the archive is now frozen, so any upload will need to be<br> shoved through the queue by an archive admin, warranting a FreezeException<br> to be granted.<br> <div class="im"><br> > Can motu-release clarify the processes in place for freeze exceptions<br> > that are in force now? I see the old policy at [0] that was in force<br> > for Intrepid. Do you plan on doing this again?<br> <br> </div>hm... for Intrepid, that worked out pretty well imho, so yes.<br> Scott, Luca, Nathan, Iulian any objections?</blockquote><div><br>No, I don't have any objections. I agree that we should follow the same <br>process for Jaunty as well.<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Iulian Udrea<br><a href="mailto:iulian@ubuntu.com">iulian@ubuntu.com</a><br>