0xffff package in Ubuntu
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 08:59:05 UTC 2015
On Saturday 06 June 2015 11:33:14 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 16:43:04 Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Ok. In ubuntu vidid is already present new updated version 0.6.1.
> > > So updated package already exists in ubuntu.
> >
> > That's fine but you still need to follow the steps at [1], and you
> > still need:
> >
> > 1) A bug with an SRU justification that covers all parts of the
> > proposed diff between what is in Trusty and Utopic now and the
> > update you're proposing. If you want 0.6.1 rather than specific
> > cherry-picks from it, then that means you need an SRU justification
> > for all changes in the diff between 0.6 and 0.6.1 rather than the
> > specific cherry-picks from it.
> >
> > 2) Uploads for Trusty and Utopic (or proposed source packages or
> > debdiffs if you need sponsorship). These need to be based on the
> > existing packages in those releases. We can't just upload the version
> > in Vivid or Wily. Even if the contents are the same, the
> > debian/changelog file needs to be based on the one from the stable
> > release being updated, explain the reason for the update and refer
> > to the bug in my paragraph 1) above. The package version number
> > needs to be one suitable for the release it's going in to - see [2]
> > for examples.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Robie
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
> > [2]
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_pa
> > ckaging
>
> I filled bug on launchpad, see:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0xffff/+bug/1462602
>
Hi, can you look at that bug report?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list