0xffff package in Ubuntu

[Pali Rohár]

On Tuesday 26 May 2015 16:43:04 Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Ok. In ubuntu vidid is already present new updated version 0.6.1.
> > So updated package already exists in ubuntu.
> 
> That's fine but you still need to follow the steps at [1], and you
> still need:
> 
> 1) A bug with an SRU justification that covers all parts of the
> proposed diff between what is in Trusty and Utopic now and the
> update you're proposing. If you want 0.6.1 rather than specific
> cherry-picks from it, then that means you need an SRU justification
> for all changes in the diff between 0.6 and 0.6.1 rather than the
> specific cherry-picks from it.
> 
> 2) Uploads for Trusty and Utopic (or proposed source packages or
> debdiffs if you need sponsorship). These need to be based on the
> existing packages in those releases. We can't just upload the version
> in Vivid or Wily. Even if the contents are the same, the
> debian/changelog file needs to be based on the one from the stable
> release being updated, explain the reason for the update and refer
> to the bug in my paragraph 1) above. The package version number
> needs to be one suitable for the release it's going in to - see [2]
> for examples.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Robie
> 
> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
> [2]
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_pa
> ckaging

I filled bug on launchpad, see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0xffff/+bug/1462602

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20150606/cbed3a50/attachment.pgp>