REVU: archiving older "Needs work" uploads

Luca Falavigna dktrkranz at
Mon Mar 29 14:31:39 BST 2010

Nathan Handler ha scritto:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard <mok at> wrote:
>> You should only archive uploads that have somehow entered the archive
>> via Debian or otherwise. It is a bad idea to archive uploads that just
>> have not been processed by the uploader, because someone else may want
>> to take them over.
> Someone else can still take them over. Anyone can browse the list of
> archived packages. Uploading a new version of the package will also
> cause it to be unarchived.

Exactly. In case of a new upload, it shows up again in "Need review"
section preserving previous comments. Loosing history only happens if we
nuke an upload, but I won't go that far.


 : :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz at>
 `. `'

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : 

More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list