steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Fri Feb 26 06:43:02 GMT 2010
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:52:49PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Regarding the team unification, is there an expectation that the two-vote
> > approach will continue? I don't have a strong preference between the
> > ubuntu-release and motu-release approaches, but I think it would be strange
> > to be applying different procedures for different archive sections - or to
> > different members of the team! - so we should probably pick one...
> I think it should go. IMO one of the main reasons to unify the teams is to
> simply the process for people trying to work through getting needed approvals.
> If we have two separate rule sets, we may as well keep it two teams (I'm not
> proposing we do this).
I think the attached diff for FreezeExceptionProcess reflects the emerging
consensus. Are there any objections if I apply this to the wiki and send
out an updated freeze process mail to u-d-a?
Are there any team delegations we want to have in place before sending out
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 9608 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20100225/c19ff43b/attachment-0001.diff
More information about the Ubuntu-motu