motu-release

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:52:49PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Regarding the team unification, is there an expectation that the two-vote
> > approach will continue?  I don't have a strong preference between the
> > ubuntu-release and motu-release approaches, but I think it would be strange
> > to be applying different procedures for different archive sections - or to
> > different members of the team! - so we should probably pick one...

> I think it should go.  IMO one of the main reasons to unify the teams is to 
> simply the process for people trying to work through getting needed approvals.  
> If we have two separate rule sets, we may as well keep it two teams (I'm not 
> proposing we do this).

I think the attached diff for FreezeExceptionProcess reflects the emerging
consensus.  Are there any objections if I apply this to the wiki and send
out an updated freeze process mail to u-d-a?

Are there any team delegations we want to have in place before sending out
the announcement?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: feature-freeze-process.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 9608 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20100225/c19ff43b/attachment-0001.diff