MOTU Release Charter

Luca Falavigna dktrkranz at ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 20 08:25:59 GMT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

First of all, thanks Jordan for your questions.

Jordan Mantha ha scritto:
>> Post FF if someone wants to start a library transition it ought to have an FFe from motu-release.  This is how we've operated for some time and nothing new (I don't think).  This is one area where motu-release does report to the Ubuntu Release team at the regular release team meetings.
> 
> Right, so it didn't seem quite clear to me what defines a transition?
> does say 3 packages constitute a transition? do we just use common
> sense there? It was also not clear in the wording that motu-release is
> only involved post FF.

I think so. Package transitions require work by archive-admins to
process binary NEW, by developers to manage rebuilds and make sure
everything is fine with new library. This requires more time than a
single, standalone upload.

Changing SONAMEs is something like a new feature to me. Most of the
times there are just ABI bump, where a rebuild is enough, but it's
better to check with motu-release to make sure to be able to complete
the transition in time according to release schedule.

- --
 . ''`.      Luca Falavigna
 : :'  :  Ubuntu MOTU Developer
 `. `'`     Debian Maintainer
   `-      GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknDUxcACgkQnXjXEYa8KlC8yACdF+KBUFYVgQNEDk/qAgKAhGyt
m4kAn2Ah/YvYvghrOrDJNzg+zu8NYzvI
=ZWBl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list