MOTU Release Charter
Luca Falavigna
dktrkranz at ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 20 08:25:59 GMT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
First of all, thanks Jordan for your questions.
Jordan Mantha ha scritto:
>> Post FF if someone wants to start a library transition it ought to have an FFe from motu-release. This is how we've operated for some time and nothing new (I don't think). This is one area where motu-release does report to the Ubuntu Release team at the regular release team meetings.
>
> Right, so it didn't seem quite clear to me what defines a transition?
> does say 3 packages constitute a transition? do we just use common
> sense there? It was also not clear in the wording that motu-release is
> only involved post FF.
I think so. Package transitions require work by archive-admins to
process binary NEW, by developers to manage rebuilds and make sure
everything is fine with new library. This requires more time than a
single, standalone upload.
Changing SONAMEs is something like a new feature to me. Most of the
times there are just ABI bump, where a rebuild is enough, but it's
better to check with motu-release to make sure to be able to complete
the transition in time according to release schedule.
- --
. ''`. Luca Falavigna
: :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer
`. `'` Debian Maintainer
`- GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknDUxcACgkQnXjXEYa8KlC8yACdF+KBUFYVgQNEDk/qAgKAhGyt
m4kAn2Ah/YvYvghrOrDJNzg+zu8NYzvI
=ZWBl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list