REVU: Automated Package Checks

Stefan Potyra stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Fri Jan 23 10:57:45 GMT 2009


Hi,

On Friday 23 January 2009 01:31:42 Loïc Martin wrote:
> Nathan Handler wrote:
[..]
>
> What happens when lintian (or another automated check) throws an error,
> but that error is not justified? I've seen the case for all cdemu
> related packages (for example
> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=cdemu-client ) where
> lintian reports an error but according to the packager (and my newbie
> review ;) ) the error is bogus. 

Nope, in this case (cdemu-client) it is indeed a packaging error (don't copy 
config.sub/config.guess in clean -- rather remove/restore the original ones 
in clean. Otherwise the .diff.gz gets cluttered).

Cheers,
    Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20090123/7cf587f8/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list