libc-client2007 transition
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Sun Jan 18 19:28:53 GMT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:08:14AM +0000, James Westby wrote:
>Do you think that Luca's suggestion to follow you in Debian and pull
>your revert of the SONAME, and then "un-transition" the packages that
>we had rebuilt for the new SONAME is a good one?
I generally believe that it is best for derivatives to keep as close as
possible to their upstream as possible - from a technical point of view,
disregarding other opinions about the Ubuntu "fork" specifically.
In this case I see no "collateral damage" with this approach. But really
I am not following Ubuntu closely so cannot reliably judge the
implications (as example, when I a few years ago helped repackage the
MoinMoin wiki engine for Ubuntu I was caught by your choice of switching
to a newer default Python version).
Good luck with this!
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklzgvUACgkQn7DbMsAkQLj5ZwCgpVE9R49L9I3jSYAWB99TY13/
kMoAn3NvMzkpfe6ErxGDcSqCyyZheRXB
=ja5T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list