New LP-liason MOTU Leaders

Morten Kjeldgaard mok at
Mon Feb 2 22:21:37 GMT 2009

On 02/02/2009, at 22.15, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> However good this list may be, it has no legitimate basis to be  
> considered
> a "MOTU" input.
> Part of our process for role transfer includes a chance for community
> review of such delegations.  Until this has happened (I guess we now  
> have
> that chance), I don't see any legitimacy to speak on our behalf.
> Alternatively, this list could have been based on input from the  
> community.
> That didn't happen either.
> I'd like to ask you to withdraw this subission and instead give the
> community a chance for input.

Your concern is completely legitimate.

However, it was short notice, and wgrant and myself decided that we  
would try to represent the interest of the MOTUs as well as we could.  
We took this chance because none of the items on the list seemed  
really controversial.

The items we chose to prioritize have to do with making our life as  
MOTUs easier, such as getting more efficient buildds, a user-interface  
for doing rebuilds easily, etc.

Please take a look at the list. if anyone has any serious objections  
to our choices, please give us feedback and we'll see if we can get  
changes accepted. (Since there are N! ways of arranging N items, you  
should probably try to make your comments general in nature.)

I hope this procedure will be acceptable to everyone.


More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list