RFS: smplayer (updated package)

Maia Kozheva sikon at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 21 13:01:30 BST 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> Since we are on the subject, I'd rather have an mplayer package without
> gui (gmplayer is buggy/obsolete and unmaintained, mplayer upstream are
> actually recommending it to not be distributed) and, if really
> necessary, have an mplayer-gui (or gmplayer) package with the gui alone.
> With the excellent stand-alone gui's we have today (smplayer, kmplayer,
> gnome-mplayer) this is what makes the most sense.
> 
> Cesare
> 

Makes sense to me. I never understood why the mplayer binary was shipped in two
conflicting packages, and removing gmplayer from the mplayer package would allow
us to simplify dependencies for smplayer, kplayer, etc.

I think the gmplayer binary should be moved into a separate binary package
called gmplayer, and mplayer-nogui made transitional to mplayer.

I would suggest also discussing this issue with Christian Marillat of
debian-multimedia.org.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknttZkACgkQGSKqQPshyAorZQCbBn/k2AeWlHu+zGGRp4WahRyM
w4wAnAy5OIDlz9JZoqHHLl4/PSvuvARE
=PgmV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list